Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alesia Riabenkova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. The IP editor, as any other, can request a WP:REFUND to restore the article and improve it on their own. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alesia Riabenkova

This draft was declined at AfC, following which an editor created a version of the page with essentially the same content in the main article space. That page was deleted in this AfD today. I am now nominating the draft for deletion, the reasons being:

the content here is essentially the same as that of the deleted article;
one of the draft's authors has blanked this draft, suggesting that they no longer wish to work on it (although it is not G7-able because there have been two major contributors to the draft); and
the draft is unlikely to be accepted given the lack of solid referencing about the subject. A search reveals no substantial non-tabloid results. /wiae /tlk 15:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Improve mainspace this version 166.170.49.77 (talk) 09:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The IP editor appears to be an indefinitely blocked editor, evading a block. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.