Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Acoria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 14:34, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Acoria[edit]

Education Project draft that are at another location. check oldid 891940830 1233 ( T / C） 14:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The author has duplicated this draft in attempting to improve it. There are at least two problems. The first is that Wikipedia is not for scientific papers in the first place, so that this is unlikely to become an article. The second is that the author is making it worse. Shoot the beast. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:19, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, leave for G13. MfD should take no action on draft nominations that should be left for the standard AfC processes, which result in G13 after appropriate waiting and auto nice messaging in logs. Accidental forking is fixed by redirection. Deliberate forking is a behavioural problem and MfD is not the forum for dealing with it, certainly not ahead of usertalk page warnings. Have any usertalk warnings been posted? The nomination is inept, lacking wikilinking to the other location. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Legacypac (talk) 03:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.