Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:US Coins (esad58)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Book:US Coins (esad58)[edit]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 03:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inexistent user book. Normally, I wouldn't care but the talk page appears at multiple categories. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 00:14, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 03:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it is blank except for a user signature, and the sole author seemingly requested deletion in their summaries of the edits that they made to the page.— Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 05:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This, a blank book, may be the most boring of all nominations, but still, relisters should not be !voters. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @SmokeyJoe: It is not disallowed (Wikipedia talk:Deletion process/Archive 9#Relisting process – Should relisting discussions automatically exclude users from any !voting in the discussion?). While I generally don't participate in discussions I relist, I weigh the circumstances to decide if it is appropriate; in this case, i.e. no one besides the nominator had participated, I deemed it was.— Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 13:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.