Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:MNM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 10:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Book:MNM

Only four articles. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ja. Per nom. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 05:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment are you sure this justifies deletion? Won't userfication be a better choice? Kayau Voting IS evil 05:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the partner to Wikipedia:Featured topics/MNM. Current practice at WP:FT is to have a matching book for each good or featured topic. Once again, checking "What links here" would have been a good idea. Bencherlite ^Talk 05:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Bencherlite -MBK₀₀₄ 05:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There's only four articles? So what? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 10:00, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Headbomb. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.