Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/Ronline

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful nomination to join the Mediation Committee. Please do not modify it.

Ronline[edit]

talk|contributions

I'm really interested in becoming a mediator since I've done mediation at Wikipedia so far in a number of cases. Some examples include Talk:Moldovan language and the problems with User:86.105.71.34 (see 1, 2). Outside of en.wiki, I've been involved in coming to an agreement at the highly-controversial Moldovan Wikipedia (see here). I'm a firm believer in mediation and justice in general. One of my most important goals as a potential mediator is to fully listen to both sides and attempt to make both of them engage in constructive dialogue and feel empathy, since I believe that the most apt accelerant of conflict is misunderstanding, isolation and alienation. Thanks, Ronline ✉ 09:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Committee:

Neutral, though leaning toward support. Seeing as the Moldovan link you gave above is extremely verbose and in multiple languages, I'd like, in your own words, a summary of the problem, what you tried to do to correct it, and the final agreement. Ral315 (talk) 15:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm afraid I haven't come across Ronline before now, and I haven't enough evidence to push me either way. [[Sam Korn]] 13:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Catherine\^talk 00:17, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I don't know you well, but I know and highly respect some of the "Others" below who gave you their vote of confidence, so I'll trust them. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 14:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Others:

I know Ronline well and think he's great. Support. Dan100 (Talk) 21:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Very Strong Support Very calm mediator, he has a very good influence in Wikipedia. We trust him as one of the best Wikipedia contributor. Bonaparte talk 13:32, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support his interventions on Moldovan language page were very helpful. bogdan 19:07, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. He is the type for the job. Alexander 007 19:14, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Jmabel | Talk 05:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. AdiJapan 09:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
SupportI think he will be a very good man for this kind of job Anclation 18:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Mihai -^talk 10:44, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Just a tag 12:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Dunemaire 16:04, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. TSO1D 16:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Vlad 23:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC) I know him from Romanian wiki where he has always done everything he could in orther to avoid conflicts. If you're looking for a mediator, he's the man for the job![reply]
- Note: most of these users probably came across this page because of a link at the Romanian Wikipedians' notice board. This is not to invalidate their votes, but just to mention why many people not usually frequenting this page have voted here. [[Sam Korn]] 16:27, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yeah, I believe Dan100 is the only person who didn't get linked here. Ral315 (talk) 22:37, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above nomination to join the Mediation Committee is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it.