Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Christian Democracy
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Status | closed |
| Request date | Unknown |
| Requesting party | Jobjörn |
| Parties involved | Itake |
| Mediator(s) | Alan.ca |
| Comment | Closed at Applicant's request. Situation had been resolved. |
[[Category:Wikipedia Medcab closed cases|]][[Category:Wikipedia medcab maintenance|]]
Mediation Case: 2006-12-08 Christian Democracy[edit]
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.
Request Information[edit]
- Where is the issue taking place?
- At the article on Christian Democracy.
- What's going on?
- A heated debate over whether the italic part of the phrase "In contrast to socialism, supports capitalism and a market economy, does not advocate class struggle, and unlike revolutionary socialism, rejects violence as a means to achieve social change." should be included.
- What would you like to change about that?
- I'd like the opinions of some other editors in order to reach a consensus, as it is quite clear that Itake and I won't reach one.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- No, it's cool.
Mediator response[edit]
Has the opposing party agreed to mediation? Is there a cited source for the statement? What wikipedia policies are involved in this dispute?
Closed as per requestor.
Compromise offers[edit]
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
Discussion[edit]
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.