Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 December 20

< December 19	December 21 >

Unencyclopedic OR with no context except a rather interesting discription. LeSnail (talk) 00:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete never going to be useful in an educational context seeing as much better images of baseball and the like exist and the description leaves a lot to be desired. -Pump me up 06:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If the amusing image description statement can be sourced, then keep. If not, delete. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's a quite good picture, one that complements the others on commons. It shows youth baseball and captures the drama of a hit quite well, better than Image:Baseball swing.jpg which is currently used in the Baseball article. It also lacks recognizable faces, which is a plus for wide use. The description can be deleted. The problem I see is a lack of an explicit copyright license.--agr (talk) 16:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. Only used in article Michael halimi that is being deleted.--agr (talk) 12:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unused and without clear intended purpose. —Sladen (talk) 13:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete blatant advertising. Pump me up 06:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Used by someone who only ever edited their userpage, and hasn't done that since March 2006. It's also got a gratuitous b-word, and would never get used in an article anyway. Moyabrit (talk) 16:05, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan + Unencyclopedic + Low quality ↔ Dennywuh (talk) 17:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan + Unencyclopedic + Ugly ↔ Dennywuh (talk) 17:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dennywuh sums it up perfectly Pump me up 06:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional, orhpan, unencyclopedic, absent uploader; has been blocked for promotional username. Rt . 18:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

user made image, not an official album cover (song isn't even a single) 76.109.54.18 (talk) 21:05, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax Pump me up 06:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned portrait of uploader, I believe tied to article that was speedy deleted 3 months ago. I believe it also violates Wikipedia's unwritten "WP:Neckties Shouldn't Be Worn With a T-shirt" policy. Smashville^BONK! 23:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: image was apparently uploaded as a school project to show how easily people can vandalize factual Wikipedia articles, which was thwarted by studious Wikipedians. [1] Isn't it ironic, don't you think? ;-) Kelvinc (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]