Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 September 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< August 31 September 2 >

September 1

Uploaded by Spazik007 (notify | contribs). CV, OR, copyrighted TV screenshot incorrectly licensed as {{GFDL-no-disclaimers}}; no fair use rationale as image is orphaned. — Rebelguys2 talk 03:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by snugspout (notify | contribs). bad info snug 03:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by ThaG (notify | contribs). CV: Copy form BBC.com And many unknown copyright image upload by him Matt86hk talk 06:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Andrew777 (notify | contribs). Copyright violation. The picture has been taken from a newspaper, not a press kit as claimed in the fair use rationale. John Dalton 08:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The bolierplate for the fair-use license of the following images says that these images can be used "where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information". Given that these players are still alive, free euivalents could be created, so the images should be deleted as they cannot be used on WP. The images are:

Panarjedde 10:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Halibutt (notify | contribs). primary source missing, was made by a (probably unknown) german citizen during WWII. Source is stated as coming from the german propagande magazine Signal so copyright protection is life of author + 70 years. I fail to see who's the author, widely available in polish archives is not PD Denniss 11:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contrary to what Denniss states above (and in his edit comments), the direct source is given. No author was specified in the original publication, nor did any of the publishers to re-publish it after the war in a plethora of books consider it non-free. If Denniss disputes the PD rationale - he could change the license to fair use, though I doubt it would matter much, as even if the author was known, the copyright would most probably belong to the publisher of the Signal magazine, which was the Reichsministry of Propaganda, that has no modern copyright successors. //Halibutt 17:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright holder is the person who took the image and as he/she is unknown the image can't be PD. In Germany there is no copyright transfer from a person to an organisation. --Denniss 18:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But the image was not made in the Federal Republic. It was made in Poland, by a person being representative of the Nazi German government, and under the contemporary laws, not under modern laws. //Halibutt 19:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. As Denniss states, 70 years pma applies to official works as well. Until then, the creator's heirs hold the rights. Since we don't know who the creator is, we cannot assume this is PD. howcheng {chat} 18:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Rufus Sarsaparilla (notify | contribs). I uploaded this image. It was my dog and I paid money for the picture, but it occurred to me that the professional photographer retained the copyright. I left it be until I was denied permission by the photographer so now unfortunately it has to come down.
Uploaded by Chanlord (notify | contribs). Lower resolution version of an image at Commons. (Image:Two red dice 01.svg) Not a valid I9 speedy because the image at Commons is not identical. Pagrashtak 14:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support deletion. Conscious 08:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Marco Krohn (notify | contribs). Orphan -Nv8200p talk 14:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The image belongs to the Debian article. It was removed from the article because someone deleted the image (too early, within 24 hours after giving me notice). License status has been clarified and I just re-added the image to the before mentioned article. Thus, please do not delete -- mkrohn 00:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination. Image added to article. -Nv8200p talk 01:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Chowbok (notify | contribs). I was the original uploader of this image. It's now blocking a better image with the same name at Commons. The Commons image is the one we've agreed by consesus to use at Beastie Boys. I can tell the whole sad story if anyone cares. —Chowbok 15:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Mark83 (notify | contribs). OB, OR Mark83 16:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Gamaliel (notify | contribs). obsoleted by Image:Sammy Davis 1956.jpg - not a valid I9 speedy. Pagrashtak 17:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Minghong (notify | contribs). OR, OB by Image:Layout engine usage share.svg on Commons. Wereon 20:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Renato Caniatti (notify | contribs). OR, NS Thuresson 20:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Samuraijon (notify | contribs). OR Samuraijon 21:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Samuraijon (notify | contribs). OR Samuraijon 21:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Throw (notify | contribs). Once again. Fair use image that has been replaced wiith Image:Reginald_Fils-Aime.jpg. Flickr page isn't the original source of the image, either. Hbdragon88 22:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The bolierplate for the fair-use license of the following images says that these images can be used "where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information". Given that these players are still alive, free euivalents could be created, so the images should be deleted as they cannot be used on WP. The images are:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2006_September_1&oldid=1138514112"