Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Railway stations in Cromer/2
Railway stations in Cromer[edit]
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted (t · c) buidhe 18:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
This article falls far short of modern standards for GAs. Two sections are wholly uncited, and the article cites, and this is not a typo, two sources in total. A few more are listed as general references with no inline citations. The article is so short I fail to see how it could be considered a comprehensive treatment of the subject. The graphic used for the first photo looks like something I could have made in MSPaint in 2 minutes. Separately, I don't see the need for this article to even exist, but that's outside the scope of GAR. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delist. If a new GA nomination for this article were to be made today, this would have been a quick fail, in large part due to the lack of inline sourcing per WP:GACR#2b. A lot of these claims go far beyond basic facts and require inline citations. Saying "the image could be better" is an understatement, but it is technically suitable for the purposes of this article. I noticed Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Railway stations in Cromer/1 was closed as "keep" solely on procedural reasons, because the nominator there cited only the article's length as an issue. However, the lack of inline citations makes this article largely unverifiable, at least for the time being, so it should be delisted. Epicgenius (talk) 16:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Also worth noting is that, at the time of the article's promotion to GA, the page was adequately sourced. The article was still sufficiently referenced at the time of the first GAR. However, splitting off the Cromer railway station and Roughton Road railway station articles has seriously compromised the quality of this page, and it now fails WP:GACR#3a. – Epicgenius (talk) 16:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)