Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mark Kellogg (reporter)/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
The article is quite short, with several sources listed in the "Further reading" section. I am not sure that all major aspects of this biography are covered in this article. The lead is also quite short and does not cover all major aspects of the article, and there are uncited statements. Z1720 (talk) 02:41, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'll see what I can do, but this is in pretty rough shape. At least the Hatch book is on Internet Archive. Hog Farm Talk 03:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Barnard is also on Internet Archive; I'm making some progress but the sources significantly disagree with each other regarding a number of aspects of Kellogg's life. Hog Farm Talk 05:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
@Z1720: - How does this article look now? I've incorported the Saum source from the further reading, and have relied very heavily on the Barnard source, which is the single most detailed and thoroughly researched work on Kellogg from what I can tell. I've replaced the unreliable web references, everything is cited, and the lead has been expanded. It is also more comprehensive thanks to the Barnard source, with the ProseSize tool measuring it at 4317 bytes and 721 words when this GAR was opened, and 12kb and 1,953 words now. Hog Farm Talk 03:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Concerns have been addressed. Z1720 (talk) 03:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- I guess to make it clearer, I support keeping GA status for this one as well. Hog Farm Talk 03:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The updates to the article are very good and I support retaining GA status.--SouthernNights (talk) 12:44, 21 December 2024 (UTC)