Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 September 6

September 6[edit]

File:Daniel Wani's picture of his daughter.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File was prodded for deletion as a non-free image being used in Mariam Yahia Ibrahim Ishag#Prison and family conditions which fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8, but was de-prodded by the reviewing admininstrator Liz who suggested the file be discussed here at FFD. Basically,this non-free image of Ishag's and Wani's baby daughter isn't necessary for that reader to understand that the two had a baby per WP:FREER. Understanding that the father held his daughter after she was born, even if her mother was in prision at the time, doesn't require that this non-free image be seen. Moreover, the image itself isn't the subject of any sourced critical commentary in the section where it's being used and it's primary function appears to be WP:DECORATIVE, i.e. lacking any sufficient contextual justification for its use as required by WP:NFC#CS. Omitting the image from the article isn't, at least in my opinion, deterimental to the reader's understanding of the relevant article content in any way. Furthermore, omitting the article from the image (figuratively speaking) just leaves a photo of someone holding a baby, so there's nothing inherent to the image that says this was a baby born to a woman imprissioned simply because of her religious beliefs. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Goias Municip Alexania.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Goias Municip Alexania.svg on Commons. ✗plicit 03:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 08:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Darlington-BS-logo.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just text so a fair use rationale is not needed for the current version but there might be a issue with the previous versions (they are hidden from non admins as per WP:NFC but they remain in the file history.) Isla (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Могила Героя Социалистического Труда Николая Псурцева.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the 1980 gravestone is not "architecture", no FOP under Russian nor US rules. It seems this has to be treated as a non-free derivative work. Felix QW (talk) 21:50, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Still - Stanley Kramer.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Work claims to be PD but the source is from a 1997 book. While not impossible that it's PD we would need better proof. Wizardman 21:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Still portrait Mike Nichols.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Work claims to be PD but the source is from a 1997 book. While not impossible that it's PD we would need better proof. Wizardman 21:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (logo).svg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality logo vectorization (WP:NFCC#5). — Ирука¹³ 21:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rock Island Clayton Depot.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An unused file that does not identify either the year of creation or the year of publication. — Ирука¹³ 22:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file was updated the day before you nominated it -- is there perhaps a logistical reason it is not in use? Again, contrary to what you've said in the past, you're expected to talk to the uploader if something uploaded 27 hours ago has a plausibly-resolvable problem, like "an image being uploaded with an incomplete file description", rather than jump to 5000 deletion nominations in two months. If you do not feel comfortable having complex English conversations with other editors on an intricate legal and social topic, you may wish to work on a project where you feel better suited to do those things, or an area of the English Wikipedia where you can collaborate with more fluent speakers. Vaticidalprophet 01:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This does look like a photograph created in the first third of the 20th Century. @Lightmetro: any insights as to when this photograph was created (I suspect this was published long ago). Abzeronow (talk) 22:17, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Originally I uploaded this file as I was going to add some additional background and history to the Clayton station article. Where today's Clayton station is on Central Avenue was once a busy crossing point between two streetcar lines and the Rock Island Railroad. I'm still working through the streetcar history and because I'm not fully clear on it yet, I haven't added anything to the article.

The picture I uploaded is the Rock Island Railroad's Clayton depot. The line was abandoned by the Rock Island in 1931 and stopped carrying passengers some time before that. While I'm not 100% on the date, it's likely early to mid-20s when the passenger service was active. Lightmetro (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Most likely published before 1928 and PD-US. Kges1901 (talk) 20:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.