Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 September 30

September 30

File:CDVictoria.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free former logo that is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Not F7 elegible as it was kept at a previous FFD with the idea that it would be used in the main infobox as there was no current logo. This is no longer the case as there is a current logo in use in the infobox. Whpq (talk) 00:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nano Guerra.jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subject is recently deceased. Per MOS:LEADIMAGE, lead images should be appropriate representations of the topic. The subject was a politician, better fair use images exist per MOS:IMAGEQUALITY. I propose deleting this file, and replacing with a better quality image. Isaidnoway (talk) 10:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Regardless of image quality, in the spirit of WP:FREER we should prefer an image such as this one, which is released under a CC-BY-NC-ND license, to an image that is not under any CC or similar license. Felix QW (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FlagsofKosovo.PNG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image quality and the white border makes it look like this image is a screenshot from a computer or a tape/TV. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 13:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cardiff City squad 1920.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 October 8. ✗plicit 00:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cardiff City squad 1920.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dorothy Boyd.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg for details. While this image is in use, I suspect it may not qualify for relicensing as a non-free image since the subject is also depicted here. So even though we don't have a sufficiently high resolution copy of that poster, it certainly exists. Felix QW (talk) 22:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.