Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 May 29

May 29[edit]

File:35W-US 10-694 North Central Corridor Reconstruction Project logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this image is below c:COM:TOO-US, as highway signs are {{PD-USGov-MUTCD}}. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 07:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what the nominator is getting at, but since the fair use rationale is about to be voided as its only use is about to be merged away, Delete. --Rs chen 7754 07:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rschen7754: The nominator is saying that the image is not copyrighted, being too simple to qualify for copyright protection, and thus should be relicenced as a free image. Which would render the fair use rationale unnecessary. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree. Some of the elements may be PD because they're in the MUTCD, but I think their arrangement and recoloring tip this over threshold of originality. As such, I think the FUR is still required, but the article for this topic is on the verge of deletion/merger away from existence. Thus, I would delete this logo once that merger is complete and the logo is no longer in use. Imzadi 1979 → 14:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only use of this image has now been merged into Interstate 694, and the image has not been used in the result of the merger. -Asheiou (they/them • talk) 12:30, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:After Dark 3 CDROM.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:51, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should be moved to Commons, since this is probably below TOO. —Matr1x-101 $_{when-replying}^{Ping-me}$ {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 10:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not that sure about the winged toaster. That is not really "simple geometric shapes". Felix QW (talk) 15:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the winged toaster drawing puts it above the threshold. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 09:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on WP the winged toaster doodles are easily above TOO, or at least reasonable suspicion of such. Dronebogus (talk) 12:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crystal Bird Fauset.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this image adds anything that File:Crystal Bird Fauset (cropped).jpg doesn't, or really anything substantive enough to make it meet WP:NFCC#8 Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, let's Delete the non-free one. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 05:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The free image covers the topic just as well. -Asheiou (they/them • talk) 12:31, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moesexeter.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Description indicates this is a very (very) old copyvio. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obvious copyright violation. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 04:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on top of being a copyvio you wouldn’t even need unfree media to illustrate this topic Dronebogus (talk) 12:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the copyvio. -Asheiou (they/them • talk) 12:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.