Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 May 24

May 24[edit]

File:Road Safety World Series Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Added to Road Safety World Series, removed two other instances. ✗plicit 13:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Generic logo being used in specific season articles in violation of WP:GETTY point 14. Current uses must therefore be removed. Probably is a fair use to use is on the general Road Safety World Series article, if someone wants to add a valid non-free use rationale for that article only. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BepiColombo insignia.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a freely licensed high-resolution image that contains this logo, albeit in different colors. We could extract the logo from that image and use that instead. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

extracted, see File:BepiColombo Insignia.png and File:BepiColombo Insignia.jpeg. Artem.G (talk) 17:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Poon Yuen Chung bag.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appearing in a newspaper article is IMO insufficient reason to de-PROD this image. This image of the re-enactment scene of Poon Yuen Chung's bag being scanned/searched (before her execution) to me still is insufficiently or not supported by critical commentary. If deleting this image isn't detrimental to understanding the article topic, her execution, then this image may have failed to be contextually significant to the topic in question. George Ho (talk) 20:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i think it should be included for context, as it shows readers what her bag looked like and helps to imagine the scene when she was first arrested WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 07:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WTAPT please stop coming up with fanciful fair use rationales like the one above. Using unfree media on a free content encyclopedia is not trivial. Dronebogus (talk) 12:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is an acceptable fair use image of her, and the image of this bag is not needed, as it doesn't meet WP:NFCC#8 (and probably fails some other rationale too). "Imagining a scene" is not a valid reason to keep. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.