Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 March 29

March 29[edit]

File:2017–18 Women's Ashes series logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a general logo for The Women's Ashes, it is the logo for one specific series. Thus, it should not be used on the general article The Women's Ashes, as it is not the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the entity in question, as it's for a different entity. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Images in List of Turkish diplomats assassinated by Armenian militant organisations[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Textbook WP:NFLISTS violation. ✗plicit 23:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These non-free images are used in List of Turkish diplomats assassinated by Armenian militant organisations to simply illustrate each entry in the list. Fails WP:NFCC#8. See also WP:NFLIST. -- Whpq (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nomination. Also, it doesn't appear that there are any articles specific to each person so the images can't be re-purposed either. Salavat (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, an image that show multiple elements of the list at the same time does not exist for this article's context. The images in this article are key visual aspects of the topic. Katakana546 (talk) 22:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ushuaia Montage.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in Argentina. One source image was deleted from Commons for this reason. Montage is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Perry Barr railway station redevelopment proposal, Dec 2020.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use criteria for this "artist's impression" no longer apply, as we have photographs, under open licence, of the completed building Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, fails WP:NFCC#1 as we have free alternative images e.g. File:Perry Barr station after refurbishment.jpg. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:59, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.