Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 June 4

June 4[edit]

File:ChemSpider Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo only consists of simple shapes and their content license are CC-BY and CC-BY-SA. Does it mean this logo fails NFCC? Should we transfer it to Commons or delete this logo? Vitaium (talk) 02:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, we just change the license.

If someone initially thought a file was non-free, but we then realize it's free, perhaps because it's available under a free license (as in this case), it's too simple to be copyrighted, or the copyright expires, we don't need to delete it, just update the info. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Running Away (Paul Haig album - cover art).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cover art (of less successful version) insufficiently supported by critical commentary. Not proven contextually significant to the whole song originally done by Sly and the Family Stone. George Ho (talk) 06:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Protungulatum liferestoration.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: These are Turkish Wikipedia files, so the deletion request should be posted at tr:Vikipedi:Silinmeye aday sayfalar Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't know where to post about this, sorry if the place or how to deal with it is wrong. These are images about paleontology uploaded to Turkish Wikipedia. These sources are just fandom wikis and are considered copyvio with no copyright guarantees. Especially for Dosya:Protungulatum_liferestoration.jpg, I know the source, non-free lisenced paper.[1] Moreover, this image does not show Protungulatum, but is simply a hypothetical reconstruction of an ancestral mammal, so it is completely false information. I don't know what to do with these images, since I can't put speedy deletion template to these page since different language page. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ToddAllenGates.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted per criterion G7. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need this file separate from File:5.5.07ToddAllenGatesByLuigiNovi.jpg? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. Delete it. Nightscream (talk) 16:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to Commons The Quirky Kitty (talk) 16:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MasterEdithOlympian.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The United States Olympic Committee is not a government agency, but a separate nonprofit entity (it's a QuaNGO). Unfortunately, that means that the employees are not acting on behalf of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the U.S. Code. That this is not a U.S. government work is contested at MCQ, where I first saw this, so I'm bringing it here for discussion at the proper venue so that we can attain consensus to label this file as non-free. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 16:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I started the aforementioned discussion about this at MCQ because I was pretty sure the file was incorrectly licensed. While that discussion was going on, the uploader re-uploaded the same file as the non-free File:MasterEdithOlympicNewFile.JPG. There was no real need to do that since the licensing and description of the PD could've simply just been changed. At this point, there's no need for two identical files and this probably should be deleted unless there's some reason why it should be kept in favor of the non-free one. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Horn Lake MS.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file with questionable licensing. The source is a private website that doesn't appear to still have the image, but it's claimed to be a work of the US government. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 17:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I recall that city-data used to have maps in that style. I believe they're the site's own work, thus is must be deleted. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 00:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mosby Tavern exterior.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photos associated with National Register of Historic Places nominations are typically taken by private individuals, as appears to be the case here, and are not PD as US government works. This particular photo was taken in 1999, so it's not old enough to be PD for any other reason. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 18:13, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flordiapj9.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source is alleged to be an unlinked YouTube video, so there's no evidence that this is actually the work of the U.S. government. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 18:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DE&S logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old logo. Cloudbound (talk) 20:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pearl & Dean logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old logo. Cloudbound (talk) 20:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Commonwealth Flag 2013.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Conver to PD-ineligible-USonly -FASTILY 02:59, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prompted to come here after encountering this DR on Commons. The flag is undoubtedly copyrighted in the UK, but it looks like it may well be below c:COM:TOO USA, so I think we might be wise to relabel this as {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 22:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.