Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 June 28

June 28[edit]

File:Only fools danger uxd.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image is an episode screenshot that lacks any sourced critical commentary. The only sourcing is to a broadcaster's web site listing it as a top 10 scene. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TVNZ (1980).svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as PD-ineligible-USonly. Whpq (talk) 11:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure if any copyright on this image is impacted by any threshold of originality factors, but there is no way this former TVNZ logo is Creative Commons-licensed. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. The threshold of originality in New Zealand leans on the lower end of the spectrum. ✗plicit 12:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TVNZ (1982).svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as PD-ineligible-USonly. Whpq (talk) 11:08, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure if any copyright on this image is impacted by any threshold of originality factors, but there is no way this former TVNZ logo is Creative Commons-licensed. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. The threshold of originality in New Zealand leans on the lower end of the spectrum. ✗plicit 12:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TVNZ (1987).svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as PD-ineligible-USonly. Whpq (talk) 11:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure if any copyright on this image is impacted by any threshold of originality factors, but there is no way this former TVNZ logo is Creative Commons-licensed. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. The threshold of originality in New Zealand leans on the lower end of the spectrum. ✗plicit 12:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TVNZ (1994).svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as PD-ineligible-USonly. Whpq (talk) 11:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure if any copyright on this image is impacted by any threshold of originality factors (this one looks simple enough that {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} might apply even if there is a copyright in New Zealand), but there is no way this former TVNZ logo is Creative Commons-licensed. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to free this logo is just simple text. I'm unsure on the others listed above but this one seems clear to me. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Convert to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. The threshold of originality in New Zealand leans on the lower end of the spectrum. ✗plicit 12:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dallas Burn logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, as although there is 2 sentences of text about the former logo, the use of this former logo in the article does not significantly enhance reader's understanding of the topic. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Houston Dynamo logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, as this image does not significantly enhance reader's understanding of the article. Also WP:NFCC#1, as the current logo exists Joseph2302 (talk) 08:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dark Side of the Moon.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 July 6. Whpq (talk) 11:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dark Side of the Moon.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Martin Scripps forge Darin Damude signature.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 July 6. Whpq (talk) 11:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Martin Scripps forge Darin Damude signature.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Only Fools Batman.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free episode screenshot is not the subject of significant sourced critical commentary. The only thing close to such commentary is an "in popular culture" mention that the scene was recreated at the Olympic ceremonies. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr. Samar Alsaggaf Profile Picture.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own-work claim. This is a professional portrait of the subject with no EXIF data. WP:VRT permission required from the original photographer. ✗plicit 23:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as a copyright violation. [1] predates the upload. -- Whpq (talk) 12:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.