Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 February 28
February 28
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:TATA WPL 2023 logo.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gorav Sharma (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No evidence this is a logo specific to the 2023 season, as it doesn't have the year on it anywhere, and so could be used in any future year too. It looks therefore like just another generic logo of the WPL, which therefore violates WP:GETTY point 14 Joseph2302 (talk) 08:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- I Oppose,
- 1. Copyright: This file is uploaded according to Wikipedia non free content policy.
- 2. Year not mentioned: Most of the times year is not mentioned on logo. Example: 1st season of IPL also doesn’t have year mentioned on its logo.
- 3. Future seasons articles usage: I mentioned that file will only be used for 2023 seasons not all upcoming seasons. You can again take the example of 1st season of IPL. Here you can see that the logo is only used in 2008 season article and not for next 4 seasons. Same in case of 2013 Indian Premier League where logo is used only in 2013 season articles and not for next 4 seasons. Same like that, this logo will only used in 2023 season article and not for upcoming seasons. Gorav Sharma 💬 09:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- And its similarities with other logo’s: This logo has an additional TATA Group logo which is sponsor of this season. And Tata logo is a logo with simple geometric and non geometric shapes and hence not considered as copyrighted according to Wikipedia policy. So no violation of Wikipedia policy has been done. Gorav Sharma 💬 09:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Doesn't look to be a year specific logo, and we already have a non-sponsored logo for the main page. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:39, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:1975-blue-notes-dont-leave-me.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FuriousFreddy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Currently used in Don't Leave Me This Way and Harold Melvin & the Blue Notes, the sample's contextual significance to the whole song and the band that originally performed the song is more likely not yet proven, and I've not yet seen how omitting the file would affect the understanding of those subjects. If no one opposes, the file must be deleted by default. (Previously nominated for different reason.) George Ho (talk) 09:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:1972-blue-notes-know-me-by-now.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FuriousFreddy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Currently used in Harold Melvin & the Blue Notes, I don't see how it's contextually significant to the band that performed the song. I doubt that it's contextually significant to the whole song either, but I can stand corrected. (Previously nominated for different reason.) George Ho (talk) 09:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:1975-blue-notes-bad-luck.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FuriousFreddy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Currently used in Harold Melvin & the Blue Notes, I don't see how it's contextually significant to the band that performed the song. I doubt that it's contextually significant to the whole song either, but I can stand corrected. (Previously nominated for different reason.) George Ho (talk) 09:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Resolved, was converted to non-free -FASTILY 01:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:Labourhome logo, 2007.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rwendland (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
NC license is considered to be fair use. Should be converted as such. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 03:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:Woolybugger.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by OregonStreams (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Small, low-res, no obvious use. Only used on Talk:Fly_fishing/Archive_1 "just in case" someone wants to use them but there are better files in subcats of c:Category:Fly tying. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, questionable licensing with no usage in the main space. Salavat (talk) 03:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:Beadharesear.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by OregonStreams (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Small, low-res, no obvious use. Only used on Talk:Fly_fishing/Archive_1 "just in case" someone wants to use them but there are better files in subcats of c:Category:Fly tying. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, questionable licensing with no usage in the main space. Salavat (talk) 03:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:Beadedpheasanttail.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by OregonStreams (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Small, low-res, no obvious use. Only used on Talk:Fly_fishing/Archive_1 "just in case" someone wants to use them but there are better files in subcats of c:Category:Fly tying. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, questionable licensing with no usage in the main space. Salavat (talk) 03:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.