Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 February 11

< February 10	February 12 >

February 11

File:Govet. High School Rajowal Teaching Staff Group Photo.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work, 3 photos of varying sizes and no metadata. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Governemnt College of Science, Lahore.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work, 3 photos of varying sizes and no metadata. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Batch-2016 I Group Photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work, 3 photos of varying sizes and no metadata. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hashd Al-Sha'abi flag.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free only for Popular Mobilization Forces. Whpq (talk) 14:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 14:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This one might be near the threshold of originality, but unfortunately we have no information on where the threshold lies in Iraqi law.

If we do not consider it to be free, we should relicense it for use on Popular Mobilization Forces and remove it elsewhere. Felix QW (talk) 17:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If it's below the US threshold, it could be tagged as PD-ineligible-USonly, which is commonly used for text logos from countries with low thresholds. My gut says it may be close to the line so I'll withhold saying whether or not it could qualify for copyright in the US. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 11:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, it is already free in the US because Iraq is not signatory to the Berne convention. The only reason we are here is that consensus has emerged that extraordinarily, for non-Berne signatories we care about copyright status in the source country instead of US copyright status. Felix QW (talk) 12:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, the only thing we don't accept is {{Copyright notes Iraq}} as a stand-alone tag. It must be used together with either {{PD-Iraq}} or a standard United States copyright tag such as {{PD-US-1923-abroad}}, {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}} or {{Non-free fair use}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The guidance on this, as well as the 2012 RfC on which this is based, are pretty clear in my opinion that we need actual PD status in the non-Berne state itself. This makes sense to me, as the close in the 2012 RfC is not entirely based on the rationale of safeguarding against future membership in the Berne convention but instead sees this as a conflict of laws situation, where Iraqi copyright law is the only copyright law applicable to the case. Felix QW (talk) 07:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you claim that we can't rely on US tags such as {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} or {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}, then we can't rely on {{Non-free fair use}} either as that is also a US tag. Instead, we would have to rely on whatever exemptions you can find in Iraqi law. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Canva Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superseded by File:Canva Logo.svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let's delete it, but copy the older revision, in case someone wants to use their historical logo in their Wikipedia page. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 11:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:London Fire Brigade Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Current version has been replaced with File:London Fire Brigade logo.svg, and older, undeleted version is possibly a non-free file. No apparent need to keep this. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Berry Scene dustjacket.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete under F10. --Trialpears (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single page pdf. Superseded by File:The Berry Scene first edition dustjacket.jpg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @Trialpears: since the file is used in your userspace. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That page was for seeing what kind of pdfs we have and possibly deleting or converting them. Deleted as F10 (possibly for the very last time before the criteria is removed). --Trialpears (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Laurel Hubbard star observer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Iridescent (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

non free alternative to contentious free image, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Asquith_Xavier#Request_for_comment_on_images_in_this_article ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive333#Image_question Turktimex3 (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Murkomen.webp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, no metadata, doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kindiki.webp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, no metadata, doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rea Vipingo farm.webp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, no metadata, doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AKA - Levels Unlocked.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very similar to standard edition, not required for critical commentary or understadning, fails WP:NFCC#8 ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.