Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 August 30

August 30

File:Dansemacabre1.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two covers are very similar and not discussed in any length in the text, so this fails WP:NFCC as non-free media that is not of high need and educational value. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Milestones.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Stifle (talk) 09:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Professional band portrait that looks more like a scan from an unattributed source. Requires WP:VRT permission from the original photographer. ✗plicit 07:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AlWasl.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This shouldn't be used on both the article about the general sports club Al Wasl SC and the specific article about the football club Al Wasl F.C.. If it's the logo of the general sports club, then use on the football article fails WP:GETTY point 17 (as the football club is a sub-entity of the sports club). However, as it has a football on the logo, it looks like the logo of the football club, and not the sports club, in which case it should be removed from the SC article. Couldn't find enough information to ascertain which of the 2 is the correct use though. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AndreaDoria.JPG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that the photo was published anywhere. — Ирука¹³ 22:04, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FBC Bari 1908.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that the photo was published anywhere. — Ирука¹³ 22:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is about five years away from the 120 year mark. It sure looks like a published photograph to me, but low resolution makes it difficult to determine how it was published. Abzeronow (talk) 18:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alfa Romeo Grand Prix.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that the photo was published anywhere. — Ирука¹³ 22:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Caproni Ca.164.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The information that the photo was taken in the 1940s has not been confirmed. There is no information that the photo was published before 1989. The licensing status in US is unknown. — Ирука¹³ 23:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or move to Commons. This is a photograph of a pre-WWII biplane that certainly appears to have been taken contemporaneously; indeed the uniforms match what would have been expected of that time. No motivating reason for deletion. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Red-tailed hawk. Color film was rare in the 1940s but it did exist, and I see no reason to disbelieve contemporaneous publication in Italy, and this does appear to be a simple photograph per PD-Italy. Can be moved to Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.