Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 September 21

< September 20	September 22 >

September 21[edit]

File:StudioUniversal.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, near duplicate of File:Studio Universal logo.svg on Commons, but not eligible for WP:CSD#F8. ✗plicit 03:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 03:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CFQK Energy103-104 logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. May be considered as a fair use file due to the background --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cguinness.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious licensing. File:Chrisguinness.jpg claimed to be an own work by another user. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gabbyandchild.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, low quality, no metadata. Dubious own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gabbyowner.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, low quality, no metadata. Dubious own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:La Toya Woods.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, low quality, no metadata. Dubious own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ChabalaUW.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed to be taken by "John Chabala". No indication whether uploader is of said person. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ChabalaBW.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed to be taken by "John Chabala". No indication whether uploader is of said person. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ChabalaUWvS.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed to be taken by "John Chabala". No indication whether uploader is of said person. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TFINT.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Affected:

Game was re-released under the MIT License in 2017. I believe this applies to the game data because there is an "artwork" folder in the repository. [1] Although we could transfer this to Commons, the original resolution is quite low. I suggest taking the opportunity to replace it with a high-resolution screenshot as that would be more useful. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Survivor 41 images[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 October 10. FASTILY 20:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Survivor 41 Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Survivor 41 dvd cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daufuskie Island, SC Community Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image is claimed to be the logo for the community of Daufuskie Island. The island is an unincorporated community, so there is nothing official. This logo is from a tourism site, and there is no evidence that this actually is a community logo. Fails WP:V. Whpq (talk) 21:57, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think this logo is below the threshold of originality and thus in public domain. However, delete on the grounds that it is not an official logo. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.