Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 November 4

< November 3	November 5 >

November 4[edit]

File:Street art from a scene in the film Fight Club.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. No freedom of panorama at all in Afghanistan. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of a film still, stencil artist unknown. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 01:17, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nippi.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 06:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

c:COM:TOYS. ✗plicit 05:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jessica Simpson - Forever in Your Eyes.ogg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uncertain how a sample of just one song "Forever in Your Eyes" helps improve contextual understanding of Irresistible (Jessica Simpson album), even with the caption citing three sources. Without clearer justification, the usage may fail WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 06:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slimmy I Can't Live Without You In This Town.ogg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Justification of using a sample of "I Can't Live Without You in This Town" in the Be Someone Else article not yet clear. Either belongs in the song article, or just delete it from the project by default. George Ho (talk) 06:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Namie Amuro - What a Feeling.ogg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Justification of using a sample of a track "What a Feeling" from an EP release (or triple-A single) "60s 70s 80s" not yet clear. May likely fail WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 06:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cover arts of Fairyland (song)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep the CD cover, delete the CD+DVD cover. ✗plicit 11:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure which image is more preferable per WP:NFCC#3a. If either undecided or no votes at the end, then let's delete the CD+DVD cover by default. George Ho (talk) 06:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the CD+DVD cover, as it's less prominent than the original CD cover. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 03:20, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moayagrape2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:42, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, only used in Moaya Scheiman, which was deleted sixteen years ago at AFD. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. ✗plicit 12:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 15:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and what a good find! Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mntyhfhrtwrng.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:42, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

c:COM:TOYS. ✗plicit 13:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 16:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheNewFrontier.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated by uploader. Duplicate of File:Highway101TheNewFrontier.jpg; the website was corrupt at the time. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 14:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoshiman6464: just tag the file with {{db-g7}}, no need for FFD if you as the uploader want a file deleted. Also it is a non-free file, it could have been just listed as orphaned and it would of been deleted in seven days. Salavat (talk) 15:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clouds on the Horizon scene.webp[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:42, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to lack contextual significance for Clouds on the Horizon, thus violating WP:NFCC#8. 2600:1700:9DD0:8FD0:FDB2:33D8:C0AB:458E (talk) 15:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

STRONG Keep - The scene depicts a same-sex kiss on a Disney Channel show, which is very unusual. Much of the commentary of the episode revolves around that moment. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 15:09, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lacks contextual significance? It's one of the main, if not the main talking point of the episode? It depicts a same-sex kiss on a Disney Channel show, something that is highly unusual and something of which that has garnered a lot of attention. I do not get how in any circumstances this violates WP:NFCC#8. Nascar9919 (talk) 04:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a sourced section in the article discusses this scene specifically. Meets WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 12:14, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Noahvansciver johnporcellino.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source site getrealdenver.com is offline, but archived snapshots do not indicate any sort of free license. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 16:02, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; It's not even in Commons despite its "Free License" claim. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 16:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.