Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 November 23

< November 22	November 24 >

November 23[edit]

File:HumbugCapture.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a picture of The Enigma (performer) eating a fish, doesn’t tell you anything about the episode other than that The Enigma eats a fish in it. Dronebogus (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fair use rationale also doesn’t seem to match the image content. Dronebogus (talk) 09:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:NFCC#8. The stated purpose is "[t]o illustrate a poignant scene in the episode (infobox)". There is nothing in the article to support this stated purpose. The use is entirely decorative. -- Whpq (talk) 14:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HalFarruġ.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This map is claimed to be public domain without evidence. It is stated to be "National Ordinance Map, Hal Farruġ, Malta" so this would be a work of the Maltese government. Per c:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Malta, this would be copyrighted for 70 years after publication. Given the date range of 1934-1949 on the map, the earliest possible publication would be 1949 meaning it would be PD in Malta as of 2019, but a later publication date by 4 years would mean it is still copyrighted in Malta. Whpq (talk) 04:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Filflamalta.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality unused image. c:Category:Filfla has better quality images, and this would not really be a good addition to that collection. Whpq (talk) 04:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo romance guadalajara.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Similar file tagged as fair use. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:26, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 07:41, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bocelli and Blige on Oprah.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From what is pretty clearly a Flickrwashing account and it's obviously a TV broadcast screenshot. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 18:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is no evidence the flickr account has the rights to release the image under a free license. A review of the other images in the account show images that are watermarked and others that are clear publicity photos. The flickr account appears to be a mishmash of copyrighted images. -- Whpq (talk) 14:40, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IndoorFootballLeague.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free former logo being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in Indoor Football League#Formation which fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFG. Non-free former logos can be used as long as their use complies with WP:NFC#cite_note-4 and this almost always means the logo itself about the logo and the associated change in brandling that led to its replacement is the subject of sourced critical commentary. Simply adding the logo to "show" what it looks like is not considered sufficient to satisfy WP:NFC#CS, except in cases where the logo is being used for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of an article about the organization the logo represents. For reference, the file was initially prodded for deletion, but subsequently deprodded with a request that it's non-free use be further discussed here at FFD. Marchjuly (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete former logo being used decoratively is not a valid fair use. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:44, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.