Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 January 14

< January 13	January 15 >

January 14[edit]

File:Deceuninck–Quick-Step cycling team logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's an old logo, as the team has rebranded as Quick-Step Alpha Vinyl Team for 2022 season, and so won't be using this logo with their old sponsor's names. Cannot see a new logo to replace with for now, but keeping old branding fails the claim for meeting WP:NFCC#8, as it's not the primary means of identifying the team Joseph2302 (talk) 15:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bank of Nevada Organic Interior Architecture.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright formalities are not required for the copyright to exist, and the creator of the work is claimed to have died in 2012. Unused image, so it would fail WP:NFCC#7. House Blaster^talk 17:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 09:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jenny from the Block still.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 13:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Sample~~ Screenshot was de-PRODded under assumption of sufficient critical commentary. The image depicts Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez at a yacht. Well, their relationship has been well known. Nonetheless, I'm unconvinced about the image's necessity to appear in the article. Reading the Jenny from the Block article, the music video is well described in text. Also, the yacht screenshot doesn't illustrate significance described by critical commentary, and readers would grasp the yacht part itself without this image. Furthermore, if necessary, a free image identifying Ben Affleck himself would be sufficient and minimal enough, even when it wouldn't technically identify Affleck in the music video. George Ho (talk) 07:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC); corrected, 08:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since there is enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion in the song's article. Aspects (talk) 00:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the image from the yacht scene to a surveillance camera one. George Ho (talk) 01:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 20:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Volumeofsphere.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source site does not indicate a free license. I even checked an archived version just in case. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 09:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete likely copyrighted, unused, and easily replaceable as someone could just make their own example of how to find the volume of a sphere, and upload it here. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Voodoo (Logo).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in the United States. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 09:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tell It Like It Is - Aaron Neville.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded a portion of the US vinyl single in Commons. The portion (side label) has no complex features that would meet US originality threshold, so it should be okay to use. Meanwhile, the sleeve I'm listing here is of a Spain single release (discogs, 45cat). With the portion of US single at Commons, the Spain sleeve may potentially fail WP:NFCC#1. Also, deleting the Spain sleeve completely from the project still wouldn't affect the understanding of Tell It Like It Is (song), especially in context. In other words, the sleeve may also fail WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 23:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.