Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 February 22

< February 21	February 23 >

February 22[edit]

File:Crawlvideo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of Brown on a building ledge in a music video not proven contextually significant to Crawl (Chris Brown song) as a whole and to the whole music video. Also, the scene possibly easily conveyed in text. George Ho (talk) 03:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Lovefool cover arts[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep the original cover, delete the reissue. ✗plicit 13:56, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If using more than one cover art is against WP:NFCC#3a, then let's keep one and delete the other. By default, if there's no consensus on which cover art to keep, then let's go for the original cover—two women in swimsuits and a half-naked guy with a towel—and scrap the reissue cover. I welcome other comments. George Ho (talk) 04:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep original: The re-release technically overlapped with the original release in several countries, so I perceive it as one continuous release period. In this scenario, I'd go with the original. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cover arts in Somebody to Love (Justin Bieber song)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 March 1. ✗plicit 13:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Somebodytolove.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Justin-Bieber Someb40D5FE8rev.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Takethatloveainthereanymore.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This artwork is very similar to the artwork for CD1 save for a few negligible differences, bringing very little contextual significance to the article. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:43, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Take that love ain't here anymore taiwan promo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no information about a Taiwanese single in the article, so this image is unnecessary. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:43, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plutonian-system-size.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion - unused raster image that was not used to create the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes House Blaster^talk 13:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Without-the-Communist-Party-there-would-be-no-New-China-excerpt.wav[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 March 21. (non-admin closure) JBchrch talk 23:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Without-the-Communist-Party-there-would-be-no-New-China-excerpt.wav (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MoStateUBearStatue.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's no freedom of panorama in the United States, so this photograph of a possibly copyright-protected statue may not be in the public domain. The image is not used on Wikipedia. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 15:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tainan baseball 002.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of free license at source website. [1] If the uploader received permission privately, then VRT confirmation is needed. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Teen Angel by Mark Dinning US single side-A.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a portion of the original US single release, thinking that an original release should be represented. I just replaced a cover art that was mistakenly identified as part of a single release. However, now that I uploaded a free portion of one of US re-releases, I'm no longer sure whether the MGM-made label is irreplaceable and/or contextually significant to the song. No objections to deleting this image if no one else objects. George Ho (talk) 20:26, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. - JGabbard (talk) 03:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you said that, and I don't know whether you favor using a sleeve or a label that I uploaded. I listed this only because I uploaded a portion that is free to use, not a non-free sleeve. George Ho (talk) 04:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kendall Phillips, Los Angeles Lakers National Anthem April 15, 2012.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a screenshot from a television broadcast. I do not believe we can house this image on Wikipedia due to our fair use policies. Missvain (talk) 21:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UK motorway M18.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by SVG, low resolution. Unlikely to be used and no value transferring to Commons. Lewis Cawte (Talk) 23:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UK motorway M62.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by SVG, low resolution. Unlikely to be used and no value transferring to Commons. Lewis Cawte (Talk) 23:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 00:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.