Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 February 17

< February 16	February 18 >

February 17[edit]

File:Trix2007.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused derivative work of copyrighted packaging. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TripSenseKit.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused derivative work of copyrighted packaging. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cherish – The Association.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close/not actionable. Open for a couple weeks with no comments. Please direct specific source/copyright questions to Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks, FASTILY 05:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I'm very sure, the whole side-A label of the US single release is ineligible for copyright and should be used in or transferred to Commons. The shield-looking logo is very unoriginal, plain, and simple. Also, the "Valiant" logo uses one of century-old typefaces. Furthermore, the red background is plain, glossy, and smooth, and information seen in the label is unoriginal expression of facts about the specific recording. Perhaps someone else else disagrees with me. George Ho (talk) 01:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:30 Seconds To Mars - Love Lust Faith + Dreams.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close/not actionable. Open for a couple weeks with no comments. Please direct specific source/copyright questions to Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks, FASTILY 05:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted twice on Commons (in 2013 and 2016) as being above the threshold of originality and ineligible for Commons. As I believe, the UK law can copyright the album cover of Love, Lust, Faith and Dreams as English artist Damien Hirst designed the cover. However, I'm uncertain about the whole cover's US copyright status. There are just circles using flat various colors, white background, and simple typeface for album title and band name. Are they enough for the US law to consider it original enough for US copyright? I tried finding images using various colors in a same shape tagged "PD-ineligible" without luck. Either "PD-ineligible-USonly" or still non-free. George Ho (talk) 04:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dali Crucifixion hypercube.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except Crucifixion (Corpus Hypercubus) -FASTILY 00:46, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remove from all articles except Crucifixion (Corpus Hypercubus) per WP:NFC#UUI #6 — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Sigh. I realize that NFC#UUI #6 is what it is, but the use of the image on the other pages where it is used should receive some attention in this discussion. It really does play a central role in the subject matter. I've been trying hard to find a policy-based argument for keeping it on the other pages, and admittedly I can't. But this makes me feel bad. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MarioKart8Deluxe.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Closed and deleted by Fastily. MBisanz ^talk 01:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need both this image and File:MarioKart8Boxart.jpg on the same article (Mario Kart 8) to represent two editions of the same game that are both covered in the article. Aside from that, this image is oversized and, if kept instead of the cover for the original MK8, should be reduced to no wider than 257 pixels. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It can be moved to that article's Mario Kart 8 Deluxe subsection. Neocorelight (Talk) 09:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is no need for two covers for identification. Fails WP:NFCC#3a Whpq (talk) 23:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iranian Americans.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Closed and deleted by Fastily. MBisanz ^talk 01:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused collage. c:File:Lotfi A. Zadeh(2004) 140x190.jpg deleted as possible copyvio. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as one of the source files has been deleted due to licensing. Whpq (talk) 23:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:28, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES and low quality. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George Trapp.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Closed and deleted by Fastily. MBisanz ^talk 01:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asserts public domain as being published between 1927 and 1977 without a copyright notice but no evidence has been provided to back up this assertion. Whpq (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YouTube Poop logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fake, fan-made logo. Pyramids09 (talk) 19:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is no non-free use rationale for this logo so regardless of its fakeness, it also fails WP:NFCC#10c. -- Whpq (talk) 20:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would say speedy delete for my own request in the criterion G7. Vitaium (talk) 22:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MCJS8Judges.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This promotional photo is being used as primary visual identification for the MasterChef Junior (American season 8) article. This image is not a title card, logo, or other similar image that is used for identifying this season of the show. Fails WP:NFCC#8. The promo phot is of the hosts who are all living people so it also fails WP:NFCC#1. Whpq (talk) 23:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Apologies in advance, as I'm not 100% familiar with everything, but would it work to instead use this poster (source) along with the 'Non-free use rationale poster' template - similar to this - or no?... Magitroopa (talk) 23:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a promotional poster would be okay. Whpq (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, I'm dumb- already a poster in use on the previous season article, lol. I'm assuming same should likely be done on MasterChef (American season 11) as well (and use a poster such as this)? Magitroopa (talk) 23:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Whpq (talk) 23:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and replace with poster per MOS:TVIMAGE. Neocorelight (Talk) 03:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment/Resolution As per this discussion, this image has been removed and replaced with the poster mentioned in this thread. I apologize for the inconvenience on this matter. Please feel free to delete this image at your convenience. - SanAnMan (talk) 15:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.