Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 December 7

< December 6	December 8 >

December 7[edit]

File:Portrait of Christine Oestreicher receiving her Oscar in 1982.tif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image is used to illustrate her winning for Best Live Action Short Film at the 55th Academy Awards. That she won the Oscar is adequately described in text and so fails WP:NFCC#1. The image itself is not the subject of significant sourced critical commentary nor would its removal detract from the understanding of the article and so fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:48, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Every Picture Tells a Story I.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of this screenshot in the Christine Oestreicher article is purely decorative. It's removal would not detract from a reader's understanding and so fails WP:NFCC#8. That Christine Oestreicher produced this is adeqautely described by text and so fails WP:NFCC#1. Whpq (talk) 00:52, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christine Oestreicher and daughters.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image of a living person is the subject of an significant sourced critical commentary and so fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:54, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Art of Remembering.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:55, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CJR exercise ride.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe this is the author's own work. The person in the photo, Chris Rogers (jockey), died in 1976. However, the file description says it's from 2007. There's not enough information to determine whether this passes Template:PD-Canada or not. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Based on the uploader's user name, there is a strong possibility that person is related to the subject of the photo, and likely has a physical print of the photo given that the EXIF indicates the photo was created with the scanner from an all-in-one printer. However, possession of a physical print does not mean they also hold the copyright, nor does the act of scanning the photo. Without information about the provenance of the photo, we cannot determine if this is a free license. -- Whpq (talk) 17:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CJR RedWing.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Rogers (jockey) died in 1976, but the Wikipedia image's description says it's from 2007. There's no indication of where or when the photo was taken to determine whether this image is in the Public Domain. No search results in Google Images or TinEye either. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:20, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Based on the uploader's user name, there is a strong possibility that person is related to the subject of the photo, and likely has a physical print of the photo given that the EXIF indicates the photo was created with the scanner from an all-in-one printer. However, possession of a physical print does not mean they also hold the copyright, nor does the act of scanning the photo. Without information about the provenance of the photo, we cannot determine if this is a free license. -- Whpq (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CJR Three Stooges.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image has a date of 2007 in the description. However, one of the people in the photo, Chris Rogers (jockey), died in 1976. There's no indication of where the photo was taken. Found a Fine Art America link that says Daniel Hagerman in the URL but I can't find a page with this image on the website. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Based on the uploader's user name, there is a strong possibility that person is related to the subject of the photo, and likely has a physical print of the photo given that the EXIF indicates the photo was created with the scanner from an all-in-one printer. However, possession of a physical print does not mean they also hold the copyright, nor does the act of scanning the photo. Without information about the provenance of the photo, we cannot determine if this is a free license. -- Whpq (talk) 17:57, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Smasher Sloan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image dates from ~1960s but is labelled as having been created on 1 December 2022 and identified as the uploader's own work. The uploader has added multiple other images of wrestlers from the 1950s-1960s represented as their own work. McPhail (talk) 11:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chief-Jules-Strongbow.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image dates from ~1970s but is labelled as having been created on 7 December 2022 and identified as the uploader's own work. The uploader has added multiple other "vintage" images of wrestlers from represented as their own work. McPhail (talk) 11:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rep. Cutie del Mar Beijing trip.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by JJMC89 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt that something of this quality is an own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unconditional warfare.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. ✗plicit 12:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file is the book cover of Unrestricted Warfare, and was originally used on the article for the book. But after article merges, it eventually ended up in the current article of Unrestricted Warfare. However, the current article is focused on the concept of unrestricted warfare, instead of the book named Unrestricted Warfare. The cover of the book in fact can only be used to discuss the book itself instead of the subject, and provides little information on "what is unrestricted warfare". The file violates WP:NFC#UUI #9 and generally WP:NFCC#8, and should be therefore deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:45, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The Unrestricted Warfare article is about the book, and includes some material about the concept, but the article is undoubtedly about the book, and so the use of this cover is compliant with WP:NFCC#8 -- Whpq (talk) 18:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw My fault. It seems that the Chinese Wikipedia article focuses on the concept instead of the book instead (超限戰是[...]在其所著的同名書籍中提出的概念[...], translation: "Unrestricted warfare is a concept proposed by [... Authors] in their book of the same title [...]"), so I naturally think that the case in the English Wikipedia article is also the same.廣九直通車 (talk) 04:21, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reza Shirmarz playwriting and literary translation.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work due to multiple cameras from this account and other socks. See also c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jasonpines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:08, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reza Shirmarz,Athens,Greece.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work due to multiple cameras from this account and other socks. See also c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jasonpines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:08, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reza Shirmarz.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work due to multiple cameras from this account and other socks. See also c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jasonpines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:08, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anton R Williams (Kalamazoo).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This file is redundant to c:File:Anton R Williams of Kalamazoo MI.jpg. This files description page is being used as a proxy for an article complete with references. See unaccepted draft Draft:Anton Robert Williams 2 Whpq (talk) 16:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 07:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Colombo Kings logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 21:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This former logo is not essential for this article, as File:Colombo Stars Logo.png is a far better logo for identifying the team. As such, fails WP:NFCC1] Joseph2302 (talk) 16:13, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:39, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Warehouse Stationery logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 21:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo unsuitable for Commons due to it being non-free in its source country. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to File:Warehousestationerynz.png. Salavat (talk) 07:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VRL-Karavanda-Jam.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 21:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photograph of presumably non-free packaging. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.