Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 December 29

< December 28	December 30 >

December 29[edit]

File:Maurice Bennett - Plate, 2014.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this is a work by Maurice Bennett, who died in 2016. This is too recent to be in the Public Domain for New Zealand (source country) or United States. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 01:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:James Olson actor.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from a 1971 US film, Paper Man, which the uploader has claimed to be public domain. But the film has a copyright notice (at 1:29:20), so it won't enter the public domain until 2067. Wikiacc (¶) 02:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Felix QW (talk) 21:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lied der FDJ.mp3[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recording of an East German youth choir singing a song by Reinhold Limberg (d. 1997). Claimed public domain here and claimed CC-BY-SA elsewhere [1] [2]. I don't see how the song could be under anything other than full copyright. Wikiacc (¶) 03:05, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly a derivative work of the song itself, which was published in 1947 and whose US copyright will therefore not expire until 2043. Felix QW (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vundavalli Aruna Kumar.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work as photo quality and lack of metadata suggest this is a screen grab from a video. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:49, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Finding Frances screenshot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just used for decoration in an infobox, not used for any critical and educational purpose. Fails WP:NFCC. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gen Asim Munir.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image is asserted to be freely licensed, and includes a link to a disclaimer page which identifies specific images which are under a CC BY-SA 4.0. Note that the wording in the disclaimer is very specific You can re-use the content given under the head "Content for public use" on this page by complying with the following terms and conditions (emphasis added). There is an image of Asim Munir listed but it is different from the one uploaded. As well, there is an archive for Dec 6 with the same timestamp as the upload, but it shows yet another image for Asim munir. Given that we have no copy of the disclaimer page showing this specific image of Asim Munir as being under a free license, this should be deleted as lacking evidence of a free license. Note, I have uploaded the image that I did find at the page on Commons. See c:File:General Asim Munir (Pakistan).jpg. Whpq (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ATI Mecha Demo Screenshot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NFCC#1: A free equivalent can be created; the image is not the subject of the article, only an example. SWinxy (talk) 20:13, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.