Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 December 22

< December 21	December 23 >

December 22[edit]

File:Nokiae61.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The wallpaper is presumably non-free and likely too prominent to be considered de minimis. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:20, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:28, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elizabeth I Locket Ring.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I came across this when I added a pic at Chequers Ring, it was hidden in the wikitext. It doesn't look like a pic one takes oneself, and per User talk:Daniel Newman, the uploader had a lot of problematic uploads. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, same pic at [1]. I'm not saying it's originally theirs. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 02:09, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jamie Hayter Champ.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jamie Hayter Champ.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Source is given as simply "Wikipedia" and it says that the image was adapted from an "existing free image", but the listed file does not exist and never has. No other evidence that image is copyright free -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:51, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a crop of a copyrighted image. c:File:Jamie Hayter.jpg which is the identified source file was deleted from Commons on 21 Dec, 2022 as a copright violation. -- Whpq (talk) 13:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Whpq: - ah, thanks - it never occurred to me to see if a file of that name had existed on Commons rather than on engWP.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:32, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I always tought this picture is too similar to pictures taken by All Elite Wrestling, the promotion [2] --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:51, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture of allen electronegativity.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused JPG screenshot of a fairly old version of Template:Periodic table (electronegativity by Allen scale). We have that template DMacks (talk) 16:08, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to the template. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.