Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 August 17

< August 16	August 18 >

August 17[edit]

File:Danny L Harle - In My Dreams sample.ogg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 01:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used in an article about music producer Danny L Harle. The de-PRODded sample is more about the recording itself and less about Harle. May fail to help readers understand the person as a music producer and may fail WP:NFCC#8, even when the caption compares it to another song. George Ho (talk) 01:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion in the article. Aspects (talk) 23:49, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sample is in a section with commentary about the artist's early musical style, including this single, and it's the only example of his music in the article. hinnk (talk) 22:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Batam Compilation.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own-work claim. An uncropped version of the top image can be found here, throwing this entire collage into doubt. ✗plicit 01:24, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete highly dubious that this is his "own work". Buffs (talk) 04:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ria Saptarika DPD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own-work claim, in circulation since at least 2013, two years prior to this upload. ✗plicit 01:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:32, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dance Gavin Dance performing at the Minneapolis, MN date of Warped Tour 2017.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, Dance Gavin Dance is still active and a proper free photo can be taken, meaning that it fails NFCC#1. Plus, there are also other photos that are free (including this one taken last month) that can replace it. reppop^talk 01:38, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barbie careers.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. WP:FREER applies. ✗plicit 23:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The license at the source page on Flickr is Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) which is not compatible for use on Wikipedia as a free image. The image also uses the license {{Non-free 3D art}} which I believe is incorrect. Dolls are not works of art, sculptures or statues - they are toys and copyrighted and trademarked. The license says the image is derivative but this is not applicable given we're talking about toys not pieces of art. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 23:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.