Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 April 27

< April 26	April 28 >

April 27

File:Alexandra Burke 1 (Jingle Bell Ball).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader was blocked in 2011 for repeatedly uploading copyright violations. As a result, the precautionary principle should be applied to their remaining "own work" claims. ✗plicit 03:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - given the uploader's history of copyright violations, these are likely more copyright violations. -- Whpq (talk) 14:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - these appear to be digital zooms and crops of photographs available elsewhere on the web. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chavy land's fountains at night, Dec 5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected:

Dubious copyright claim because some of the uploader's other photographs show different watermarks. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Claim of own work is not credible given that each and every one of these photos bears a different watermalr credit to a different photographer. -- Whpq (talk) 14:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Myselfrishi5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality. Distorted colors. Blurred. 103.81.250.190 (talk) 10:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carrot and Stick.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCCP #8: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The removal of this image would not detract from a readers understanding of the article. The image's use is essentially decorative to fill in the infobox. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 14:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NFCC#8. There's no default allowance for a screenshot on TV episodes --Masem (t) 12:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - more useful new image has been uploaded. Geanard (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Geanard: Stop uploading stuff. You're not making sure it meets NFCC#8. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina: With your interpretation, hundreds of images from BCS/BB universe does not meet NFCC#8. I'm just adding a couple more of the whole mess, yet it's my fault for 'not making sure'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geanard (talk • contribs) 13:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Geanard: That's exactly what I'm saying. STOP uploading screenshots unless they have significant meaning/analysis, such as the image in "Wine and Roses". Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rock and Hard Place.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCCP #8: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:39, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The removal of this image would not detract from a readers understanding of the article. The image's use is essentially decorative to fill in the infobox. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 14:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be that guy, but if this needs to be deleted then every single article for every single episode of Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul (and many other prestige TV dramas) need to be revisited because their infoboxes all use copyrighted material (screenshots) in their infoboxes. 2600:1702:1630:6B70:E0C7:C5A6:DDC9:4F4D (talk) 05:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that probably needs to be done (and for a lot of TV series). That doesn't mean every screenshot is going to be deleted - the one for Wine and Roses is probably fine because there's supporting prose that talks of the connection to Citizen Kane/Rosebud from a directorial standpoint, and I'm sure several others can be described in similar ways. --Masem (t) 12:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start nominating them for deletion later today if I have time. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per NFCC#8. No default allowance for screenshots on TV episodes. --Masem (t) 12:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GeorgdonatusHD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image licensing assert this image is PD because it was first published outside the United States prior to January 1, 1927, but the file information indicates this image dates to 1931 so the PD template obviously does not apply. Whpq (talk) 14:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and fix the licensing. {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} Buffs (talk) 02:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The author is known. The source site gives the photographer as "Louise Brockmeyer, Darmstadt". -- Whpq (talk) 13:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NRT TV's building at night.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work because the image could be found on Facebook prior to the upload to Wikipedia. [1] Image is not in use. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lil Nas X Montero (Call Me by Your Name) screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC as there is nothing depicted which is already not described by words. Music videos are copyrighted material and therefore should be used limitingly and sparingly where words alone don't suffice (WP:NFCC#8). No rational for replacibility has been supplied (WP:NFCC#1). ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lil Nas X Sun Goes Down screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is high quality and from a copyrighted work. Music video stills are not automatically granted under WP:NFCC. The contents of the image are already substantially described in words, thus failing to explain WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#2 and WP:NFCC#3. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.