Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 September 26

< September 25	September 27 >

September 26

File:FNM Epic Sample.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Currently used in Epic (Faith No More song), Faith No More, and The Real Thing (Faith No More album). Usages of the sample in the album article and in the band article don't improve understanding of what the album is about and what the band is about. The usages may fail WP:NFCC#8 ("contextual significance"). Initially unsure whether usage in the song article improves understanding of the song. However, from what I've seen, the critical commentary to date doesn't support the content of the sample, even when the sample merely identifies the recording. Thus, the usage may also fail the criterion. George Ho (talk) 08:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image of Abhodi Lahib (Kapre).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 17:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sedan vs. wagon pillar configurations.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Languages on Indian Currency.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indian currency is copyrighted for 60 years from publication. The indicated source, File:100 INR Rev LR.png, was deleted per WP:F5. Stefan2 (talk) 18:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sheikh Ali Jimale.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. ✗plicit 01:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of {{PD-author}}. Potentially {{PD-Somalia}}, but copyright status outside Somalia depends on the citizenship of the photographer, the country of residence of the photographer and the country of first publication. Stefan2 (talk) 18:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, if PD-Somalia cannot be established then it could be relicensed to "Non-free biog-pic" as the subject is dead. Salavat (talk) 05:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:StewartLittle19thCentury.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete source. Stefan2 (talk) 18:21, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beatrice Hahn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the permission statement appears to go to a message on the uploader's personal Gmail account. The URL can't be accessed without knowing the uploader's Gmail username and password and so the permission can't be verified. Stefan2 (talk) 18:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Bear Quartet as pictured by Kevin Conrad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 01:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not really a "unique historic image", just a band's promo photo. Although the group broke up in 2010 and it may be difficult to find a usable freely-licenced photo of them (although there are a few blurry ones on Flickr), all the band members are still alive and two have photos on Commons, so it's possible for a gallery of five faces to serve the same purpose here without having to claim fair use on this image. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: @Cliferton: but I have changed the historic image template for {{Non-free biog-pic}} which is the correct one for such an image in a biographic article used as identification of the subject in the infobox. ww2censor (talk) 10:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Since @Ww2censor: has changed the template to the appropriate tag, there is no reason that the file needs to be deleted anymore. The file unambiguously falls under fair use and fits Wikipedia's guidlines. Cliferton (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Latinmethod.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 18:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Olsztyn poland europe.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It says that this was Taken from Estonian Wikipedia. At the time, the Estonian article about Olsztyn contained the image et:Fail:Olsztyn poland europe.JPG. Is that the file which was uploaded to English Wikipedia? et:Fail:Olsztyn poland europe.JPG was deleted in 2010 by User:RobertRSMN, although it doesn't say why. Stefan2 (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arms of Stuart of Darnley, Earl of Lennox.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no information about the copyright status on the file information page on the source wiki. There is a cc-by-nc-sa logo in the footer on the source wiki, but that could just refer to text, not images. No evidence of cc-by-sa. Stefan2 (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bags of "Megazoo Louro José Friends" bird food.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted packaging. Not sure if it qualifies for fair use. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Florestal's Louro José chewing gum boxes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted packaging. Not sure if it qualifies for fair use. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.