Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 November 24

< November 23	November 25 >

November 24

File:ScarAndHyenas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Depicts a scene of the main antagonist of The Lion King at the top of the tower of hyenas. Identifies a scene from "Be Prepared" act, but I'm unsure whether it improves the understanding of the song in question. Default to doubting it, but I can stand corrected. George Ho (talk) 03:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Feelin so good.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Identifies Jennifer Lopez and her mother in the "Feelin' So Good" music video. In the scene, her mother feeds Lopez. I'm unconvinced that critical commentary is sufficient enough to support the image, which may fail WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFC#CS. Furthermore, the scene is already described and easily understood in text, making the image replaceable per WP:FREER and WP:NFCC#1. George Ho (talk) 06:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Claire Monis wiki.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reuploaded after being deleted on Commons. No license, no source, no author, no date of first publication. Maybe it could be kept under a fair use rationale, but the uploader needs to provide one. Yann (talk) 08:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete image should be assumed copyrighted, as it's impossible to tell from the information whether it's old enough to be public domain in US and country of origin. Cannot be used as fair use, as fails WP:NFCC#1, as there are other images of her from a similar time period in the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Proteroctopus ribeti fossil.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image is used under a fair use rationale. c:File:Proteroctopus ribeti.jpg has been uploaded from [1] which is very similar, but not the same photo. The shadows differ and it appears to include slightly more debris. I suspect this fair use image was taken slightly later after the fossil was further cleaned. We can't rule out c:File:Proteroctopus ribeti.jpg being copyvio (could be a derivative work, someone taking a copyrighted photo, adding a text layer and uploading it with a free license) but unless we have proof of that we should probably just accept it and thus delete this fair use image. For reference, the source of this fair use image is dead but it was archived. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~I withdraw my nomination~~ Coffee.. I'm a gullible idiot. Credit: From “Proteroctopus Ribeti in Coleoid Evolution,” by Isabelle Kruta et al., in Palaeontology, Vol. 59; November 2016. (I'm not in the mood for discussing the file on Commons but anyone reading this is free to do so) — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Paranaja: FYI — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jérémie Bardin, who uploaded the image to Morphobank, was one of the authors of the study in which the image was originally used. Thus, it's unlikely to be a copyvio. Here is another version of the image without any text. --Paranaja (talk) 15:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Paranaja: Ah, very nice! I un-withdraw my nomination for the fair use image. The image from your link is higher resolution as well. Do you plan to upload that one too? (don't forget to request LR using c:Template:LicenseReview for images you upload from external sites) — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 15:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the other image so late that I didn't have time to upload it; however, I plan to do it later. Thanks for reminding me of the LicenseReview! --Paranaja (talk) 19:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Madonna borderline music video.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When Legolas2186 uploaded the prior revision of the file, the screenshot of the "Borderline" music video originally depicted Madonna in her usual boy-toy look, danc[ing] with one of the dancers on the street of a Hispanic barrio. Then Chrishm21 changed the file to a screenshot of Madonna and her Hispanic on-screen boyfriend to illustrate interracial relationship. I appreciate the uploader's efforts to improve understanding of the music video. However, I wonder whether the image is necessary for such understanding and whether deleting the image would affect such understanding.

The music video is about (as described in the song article) Madonna's love triangle with her onscreen Hispanic boyfriend and a white photographer more than about just one relationship. Moreover, IMO critical commentary focuses more on the love triangle and on Madonna's onscreen expressions than about the specific relationship depicted in the image, although the onscreen relationships reflected Hispanic women more. Furthermore, IMO the text about the music video is potentially easily understandable without the image. George Ho (talk) 23:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.