Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 May 24

< May 23	May 25 >

May 24

File:Rough and Ready Republic 1850 Flag.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 May 31. ✗plicit 12:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rough and Ready Republic 1850 Flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Human chromosomal position of WDR90 gene.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 12:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from a website and permissions says "Free for academic non-profit institutions." so GFDL claim is unsure. MGA73 (talk) 09:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WD40 repeat domain for protein WDR90.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 12:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from a website and permissions says "Free for academic non-profit institutions." so GFDL claim is unsure. MGA73 (talk) 09:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Old Paper Mario Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. If the crumpled paper effect was designed digitally, it is copyrighted. If it is a photo of crumpled paper, then the photo is copyrighted. This can not possibly be freely licensed unless the author releases it as such, which is very unlikely for Nintendo will do. ✗plicit 07:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The licensing on this logo claims it to be PD as it is too simple for copyright. Although much of it just text in a specific font, it is backed by crumpled paper which is more than a simple geometric shape. Conversion to non-free is not an option as it is not being used for identification in the infobox nor is it the subject of significant sourced commentary int he article body. Whpq (talk) 14:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, sounds fair enough. The only reason why it's being used currently is due to it being free, so why not use it? It would definitely fail NFCC if converted. Panini!^🥪 15:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have crumpled a paper before 2012 so in that case I have the copyright for all crumpled paper :-D Okay I get the point but per WP:TOO I think the crumpled paper is also too simple to be copyrightable. --MGA73 (talk) 16:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.