Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 May 15

< May 14	May 16 >

May 15[edit]

File:Jackie Appiah.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This streaming platform likely does not have the authority to license this. As a living person, non-free use would not meet our non-free use policy either, so this should be deleted. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 12:29, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agree that the uploader doesn't have the authority to re-license it under a free license. -M.Nelson (talk) 11:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martha Layne Collins photo, 1986.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] source dead and not in Wayback machine. Unable to verify the (rather improbable) GFDL license. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is not likely that they licensed the photo GFDL as that license is not very used outside Wikipedia. --MGA73 (talk) 19:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Virgilio Giotti on Il Zibaldone.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image of a newspaper page is stated to be used to "Show Giotti's Appunti Inutili published on Il Zibaldone, and provide another picture of Giotti". That Appunti Inutili was published can be understood with text and does not need an image to understand that. File:Virgilio Giotti.jpg is a free image so there is no justification for providing a non-free photo. Both components of the stated purpose fails WP:NFCC#1. Whpq (talk) 12:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.