Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 July 25

< July 24	July 26 >

July 25

File:Kardaritsi Village4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax uploads? All the images have some obviously Photoshopped aspects to the them, like the statues, a winding road, signs(?). None of these files can be trusted in being authentic. ✗plicit 10:32, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, poor quality in terms of photography and photoshop skills. Agree with the hoax claim. Salavat (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pagodas at Fir Lake in downtown Guilin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Freedom of panorama in China requires attribution of the work that is photographed, so the licensing is inadequate even if the photo is the uploader's own work. RL0919 (talk) 23:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No indication of free license at now-defunct source website. [1] Also unused. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:32, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Panhome.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Complex logo, looks recent enough to be copyrighted. Also not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:36, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.