Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 February 26

< February 25	February 27 >

February 26[edit]

File:Pyotr Glebov.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Originally tagged for deletion with {{di-replaceable fair use}} by Marchjuly with the following rationale: File's non-free use in And Quiet Flows the Don (1958 film) fails and WP:NFCC#1 (see WP:FREER for details) and WP:NFCC#8 (see WP:NFC#CS for details). While a non-free screenshot can be sometimes be uploaded and used in Wikipedia articles about films, this is usually only when the screenshot itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary (e.g. perhaps about some type of filming technique, special effect) as per WP:FILMNFI. A screenshot simply showing how an actor appeared in a film to help illustrate the film's plot is a type of WP:DECORATIVE non-free use that is not allowed per policy, unless there is sourced critical commentary about their appearance. The reader doesn't need to see a screenshot of Glebov to understand that he appeared in the file per NFCC#1 and NFCC#8 and not seeing this particular screenshot would not be detrimental to the reader's understanding of the article content related to Glebov or the film's cast in general in any way. It matters not whether the file has been uploaded and used on Russian Wikipedia because each Wikipedia project has its own policies and guidelines regarding image use and Wikipedia's non-free content use policy is much more restrictive than that of many other projects (see also WP:ITSFAIRUSE for more on this). There is actually a freely-licensed image of Pyotr Glebov (File:Pyotr Glebov Postal card Russia 2015.jpg) being used for primary identification purposes; so, even though Glebov is deceased, the rationale provided for this file's current use isn't really correct per WP:NFCC#1; even if the argument presented would be considered OK per WP:FREER for use in the "Pyotr Glebov" article, that argument would apply to file's non-free use in the biography about Glebov, not articles about film he appeared in, even if he had a major roll in the film. This was contested by Knightoften with the rationale on the file's talk page. Listing here as a neutral party for further discussion. Ə XPLICIT 00:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The photo itself is not the subject of significant source commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 01:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: Just checking for confirmation, did you read File talk:Pyotr Glebov.jpeg. Extract from that page: As per WP:FILMNFI, "a non-free screenshot can be sometimes be uploaded and used in Wikipedia articles about films, usually only when the screenshot itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary," but it does not have to be as just mentioned - in this case, there is no free equivalent. It is believed that this image depicting the distinct military garb of the subject enhances reader understanding of the topic more than words or available free-use content alone can communicate. I defer to the experts, of course, if that doesn't meet #8; this is my first time uploading an image. I had no idea it was so complicated.Knightoften (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did read the talk page, and I reiterate that the use of the image fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: Just checking, cheers Knightoften (talk) 21:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jay Neveloff Headshot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Permission confirmed valid. Stifle (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image is sourced to Flickr and it does have a CC-BY-SA listed there. However, that Flickr user's photostream has a grand total of this one single image. The EXIF on the image indicates the copyright holder as "(c)DavidBeyda". OTRS confirmation of permission would be required. Whpq (talk) 01:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permission from copyright holder "(c)DavidBeyda" has been submitted to OTRS. NinaSpezz (talk) 15:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: OTRS agent: Permission has been granted, ticket:2021022610007982. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 20:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bohrium hassium meitnerium ceremony.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 as this is a decorative image being used in articles of chemical elements and does not identify subject of discussion in the articles (i.e. the chemical elements). Wcam (talk) 14:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reading the policy carefully as the uploader, that's fair enough. We don't have a picture either for the ceremony on Nh, and it doesn't hurt the article that much, since the only important point is that it happened. So, I'm OK with deletion. Double sharp (talk) 06:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hunt Saboteurs Association logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC) delete Copyright violation Hsa1963 (talk) 18:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aardakh 1944.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Stifle (talk) 17:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Takhirgeran Umar with the reason "The photograph does not show the eviction of the Chechens and Ingush, perhaps it is Ukraine. I also admit that this is a picture from a movie." FASTILY 22:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here they write that this is "Getting food by the Komsomol brigades during the development of virgin lands". That is, in the photo, the goods are unloaded.--Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be a better source to challenge this claim than just a random post of some guy on Facebook.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 11:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an authoritative source in which it says that this is a deportation picture? We have no such.--Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 07:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.