Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 August 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< August 3 August 5 >

August 4[edit]

File:Tahitiantreat.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tahitiantreat.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kwhubby (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused derivative work of copyrighted design. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Halley Project(Atari Commodore).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Halley Project(Atari Commodore).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Darth Azrael~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Contains derivative work of copyrighted book cover. Unlikely that uploader is also the designer. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Convergys logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Convergys logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kguirnela (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned; superseded by File:Convergys logo.svg. — Pbrks (talk) 13:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Audio cassettes wrapped.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Audio cassettes wrapped.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mikus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Derivative work. Raising a DR to see if this qualifies for De minimis. Sreejith K (talk) 14:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a photo made by me. Mikus (talk) 14:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CanpotexLogo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:CanpotexLogo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ahunt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned; superseded by File:Canpotex logo.svg. — Pbrks (talk) 17:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I just updated the licensing on this logo file, but, even so, given we now have a good alternate SVG version of then logo, I don't see any reason to keep this file. - Ahunt (talk) 17:52, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 14:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Di Dongsheng.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Di Dongsheng.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Foxhunt38 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Screenshot from a video. Unclear if the original (upstream) work is legitimately PD (or if it is a derivative of non-free content itself) FASTILY 21:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This file seems to have been previously uploaded a couple of different times. It appears to have been first uploaded as non-free content on July 20 under the the same file name as non-free content, but was deleted per WP:F7. It was then apparently uploaded as File:Di Dongsheng.jpg as PD on July 26 but was deleted per WP:F9. This latest version was uploaded on August 4 also as PD, but there are concerns about it as well. This latest version is sourced to www.rfa.org/mandarin/pinglun/heqinglian/hql-12102020123846.html which might be a case of {{PD-USGov}} if the content 100% originates from Radio Free Asia. Not all content found on US government websites, however, is automatically PD as explained in WP:PD#US government works, and this image actually has the look of a WP:Derivative work on the source website. If that's the case, then RFA might not really be the original copyright holder of the photo which would mean it would probably be ineligible for "PD-USGov". I believe the two other versions of the file were sourced to different sites and were described as a "video captures", but this can be confirmed by an administrator who can seen the deleted versions. I think that this file might originally come from this YouTube video which doesn't appear to be PD. This larger version of what looks to be the same image found in a French article is attributed to YouTube (more specifically "Jennifer Zeng / YouTube"). Furthermore, there appear to be quite a number of screenshots from the same video being used in a various news articles like this which also credits YouTube and this which credits Jennifer Zeng. All of these might indicate that the RFA website was just using a screenshot like other the various other news websites, and just didn't attribute the source correctly. I'm not sure this can be kept unless it can be demonstrated that the original video and not just a screenshot was created by RFA. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • The Youtube video you link has blurred out logo/wordmark in the topleft and bottom right corners, suggesting that even it is a derivative work. -M.nelson (talk) 09:46, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Definitely a derivative work. It's unclear who the original source is, but without any proof we must presume that it's copyrighted and thus non-free. -M.nelson (talk) 09:46, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Australia 108 design.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australia 108 design.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MelbourneStar (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The building in question was completed in 2020, so a free photo could reasonably be taken (NFCC#1). The design of the building has changed since this file was created, but the difference (height reduction) is already sufficiently described in the article body, so the removal of this image wouldn't have a significant detrimental effect on the reader's understanding of the article (NFCC#8). -M.nelson (talk) 23:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2021_August_4&oldid=1038372203"