Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 August 27

< August 26	August 28 >

August 27

File:HAL-HF-24-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

c:File:HAL-HF-24-Marut.jpg is another version of this and appears to look better: sharper, higher resolution, not underexposed, slightly less cropped. The local file is older. (25 June 2004, Commons file is from 1 June 2006) It's borderline WP:CSD#F8. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 00:41, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to Commons image. -- Whpq (talk) 02:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 08:37, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hamlet poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Has a non-free use rationale for https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamlet_(EWTC_show)&oldid=754261692. Now only used on East West Theatre Company#Productions, failing contextual significance. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 00:45, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I've removed it from article (along with other prosters) as it fails WP:NFCC#10c. It is now orphaned non-free. -- Whpq (talk) 02:13, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Larry King and Diane- Larry King NOW.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image has a stated purpose of "To show the validity of Diane's hard work in the LGBTQIA community and how it has not gone unnoticed." This image provides no such illustration being just a picture of the person with Larry King. The image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I can link the video of Daine Anderson-Minshall that proves this is her with Larry King. That is what prompted me to reach out to her in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpA5BaC2jtk As you can see, not only is this true information but valid reasoning on why her picture which was older needed to be replaced. LEt me know what more proof you need.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aspieaboutit (talk • contribs)

I think you are misunderstanding the reason for the nomination. There is no dispute that the person appeared on Larry King's show. However, as a non-free image, it must meet all of the non-free content criteria. WP:NFCC#8 about contextual significance means that photos must not only enhance understanding, but their removal would be detrimental. That usage in the article does not meet this criteria in my opinion. -- Whpq (talk) 18:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. Minshall and apparently still active publically which there's no real reason per WP:FREER to justify the use of a non-free image for primary identification purposes. In addition, there's also no reason to justify a non-free image of her and Larry King to show that she was a guest on his show; if proof is necessary to support a claim that she was such a guest, then a simple citation to a reliable source (even a citation of the particular episode itself) could sufficiently do that. Finally, trying to justify the files use as "To show the validity of Diane's hard work in the LGBTQIA community and how it has not gone unnoticed" is pretty much a textbook example of WP:DECORATIVE non-free and lacking in the contextual significance required by NFCC#8 per WP:NFC#CS. None of this my comment is intended to detract from any of Minshall's achievements or hard work, but those are things that are simply not (at least in my opinion) valid reasons for justify the non-free use or this or any other non-free image of her per WP:NFCCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Malaysian film classification logos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; superseded by File:Malaysian film classification logos.png. — Pbrks (talk) 01:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to PNG file. Salavat (talk) 08:40, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boise sign.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work Kuttappan Chettan (talk) 03:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stormtrooper (Star Wars).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 October 10. FASTILY 09:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stormtrooper (Star Wars).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Letter from Bishop Paren Avetikian on the Occasion of Death of Baghdasar Arzoumanian.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

scan of a letter, likely derivative of non-free content (text), dubious self-work claim. FASTILY 06:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heisenberg-12983-content-portrait-mobile-tiny.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source has no indication of permission, so even if a license is added, this would likely have to be licensed as non-free fair use. However, there's already two freely-licensed images of Heisenberg in his article, so this would not rise past the nonreplaceable hurdle of WP:NFCC. Hog Farm _Talk 13:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There's a source for the image as a caption on the image in the Werner Heisenberg article. That source goes to nobelprize.org which does not have a free license. There's no indication anywhere that this image is available under such a license. Given that it's very likely non-free, it fails WP:NFCC #1, as we can and have obtained free license equivalents. I was tempted to db-f9 it, but given the image is likely from the 1930s, perhaps someone can prove its fallen into the public domain. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mascilogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; likely non-free logo owned by Manila Science High School. — Pbrks (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The licensing claims that the uploader is the copyright holder and releases it as PD. That's not even remotely credible. The summary information states "This logo is made freely available for the students to use" which might be true, but that isn't the same thing as a free license a free license compatible with Wikipedia and certainly isn't PD. Note that the image is used in an infobox. Note that the logo in SVG format is uploaded and in use and marked as non-free in contradiction to the licensing of this file. -- Whpq (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MassinoVisconti-Stemma.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; superseded by File:Massino Visconti COA.png. — Pbrks (talk) 14:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to PNG file. Salavat (talk) 08:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:McGeorge School of Law Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; superseded by File:McGeorge School of Law logo.png. — Pbrks (talk) 16:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to PNG file. Salavat (talk) 08:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BAF Pilot Kluz Mechanics.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status. No prejudice to restoration if someone can provide a source/citation explicitly proving that these files are freely licensed -FASTILY 01:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image that isn't eligible for either Italian or Serbian PD templates and would have copyright restored. Sennecaster (Chat) 17:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listing more files for the same reason; conflicting licenses, not eligible and would be orphaned nonfree. All uploaded by RomânescEsteLatin. Sennecaster (Chat) 18:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sennecaster, for clarity, presumably you're saying that Italy isn't the source country for any of these? If so, what is the source country? Because PD-Italy does appear to apply and you should be able to use these freely in Italy. But unless Italy is the source country we don't really care about that. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 05:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz; I'm honestly not sure where the source country is for this one. The conflicting succession notice and the PD-italy confused me, and I wasn't turning up anything on searches, so I figured an FFD would help clarify. Sennecaster (Chat) 12:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.