Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 April 26
April 26[edit]
File:MitreSmall.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:MitreSmall.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Doops (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned image. Cropped from a PD image still hosted at Commons into a lossy format, a vector version also exists and is being hosted currently. If we needed this image in the future, it could be recreated.
Note: Previously nominated (and nomination withdrawn): Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 August 3#File:MitreSmall.jpg ★ Bigr Tex 02:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Prudham 2009, p126.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Missing evidence of permission. If you are the copyright holder and/or have been authorized to publish this image, then please follow the instructions on this page. -FASTILY 00:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Prudham 2009, p126.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RedCorvus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
"Permission granted by author" old-style copyright problem... where's the proof? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
I have a pdf / screenshot of the email exchange with the creator of the item in question -- not sure where I would post that to prove this? User:RedCorvus — Preceding undated comment added 16:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Lysi-dome.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Lysi-dome.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Argos'Dad (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Not a valid PD-art this is a photograph of a dome with a painting in the middle. Because of the dome part and lighting around the edge of the photo, it is not just a reproduction of a 2D public domain work, but rather the photo is subject to its own copyright. Dylsss(talk contribs) 13:14, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.