Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 4

< May 3	May 5 >

May 4

File:Clayface Batman The Dark Knight Vol 2 23-3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clayface Detective Comics 938.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KarloClayface.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clayface of Tragedy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. While the name of the human is different, the depiction of the character is not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clayface-Batman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the image captioned "Matt Hagen as Clayface on the cover of Detective Comics #298". There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clayface3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the image captioned "Matt Hagen as Clayface on the cover of Detective Comics #298". There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mini gate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 - This is used to illustrate a variant only discussed in a single line in the article, and is not critical to the understanding of the main topic.

Fails NFCC 3a - There are a dozen non-free images in the article, most images of substantially similar devices. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nightwing Vol 2 132.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nightwing DC 851.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BeastboyOYL.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:05, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beastboythingschange.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:05, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beast Boy.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles; one at most is needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:05, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flash224.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jenkem1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free media no longer in use. Citizen ☎ 06:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added {{di-orphaned fair use|date=4 May 2020|help=off}} to that page. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

George restored the image, so never mind. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for not following the proper process. IMO the image is not informative because the text is unreadable and so it does not add anything of value to help understand the subject.-- Citizen ☎ 04:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's all right. Alternatively, you should use PROD tag especially for uncontroversial deletions. I wouldn't encourage (or discourage) orphaning images, especially ones that are on FFD. George Ho (talk) 05:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update - I undid your orphaning, which was summarized in your edit summary as "unreadable and therefore useless". I added the "ffdc" template into the caption for readers to see. George Ho (talk) 23:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Citizen: so that he can see your revert and since you're referring to his edit summary. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sole prose supporting the image is "On September 26, 2007, the Sheriff's Department of Collier County, Florida issued an internal bulletin about jenkem based on a TOTSE internet forum post by user "Pickwick", which included purported photos of the manufacture and use.[6]". That's not enough - in my eyes - to satisfy NFCC 8. Seeing an image of a bulletin is not critical to understanding that law enforcement responded to the purported use of this substance. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Program-logo-rpg-maker-vx.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a - There is already a logo in the infobox. The article does not need five substantially similar non-free logos. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo vxjp.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a - There is already a logo in the infobox. The article does not need five substantially similar non-free logos. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Program-logo-rpg-maker-vx-ace.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a - There is already a logo in the infobox and another one in the collapse box for this version of the tool. The article does not need six substantially similar non-free logos. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RPG Maker VX Ace - Japan Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a - There is already a logo in the infobox and another one in the collapse box for this version of the tool. The article does not need six substantially similar non-free logos. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vx-ace-gallery-06.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. UI is not singificantly different from the UI of the base version, already included in the article, and the changes to the UI are not discussed in prose, so this is not vital to the understanding of the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Program-logo-rpg-maker-2003en.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a - There is already a logo in the infobox. The article does not need three substantially similar non-free logos. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RPG Maker 2003 (logo).gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a - There is already a logo in the infobox. The article does not need three substantially similar non-free logos. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commment Japan as fairly lenient threshold of originality rules. Since both of these logos are in simple fonts, I think they might be below the threshold of originality. This applies to the discussion above this as well. Sam-2727 (talk) 02:35, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newyorker cover 19april1999.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 - This appearance is not the subject of significant critical commentary and is not vital to understanding the subject of the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This particular image is discussed in the article, and is an example of Plastic Man's presence outside the actual comic medium. Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Being discussed in the article is not enough to meet NFCC 8 - it has to be vital: "significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HouseOfMystery160.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 1, 3a, and 8. Depiction not significantly different from the freely licensed image in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultraman Tiga In X.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UltramanTigaTypeChange.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. Simple color change can easily be described using prose alone. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Howard in Spider-Man 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gwenstacey-thespectacularspiderman.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gwen Stacy (Earth-1610).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spider-Gwen 1 Variant.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spider-Gwen, Ghost-Spider 5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Katana Arrow.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Katana (Karen Fukuhara).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brothers of Italy.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Non-free logo used in a gallery context. Not substantially different from the version in the infobox. Variations in logo not the subject of critical discussion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brothers of Italy 2017.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Non-free logo used in a gallery context. Not substantially different from the version in the infobox. Variations in logo not the subject of critical discussion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fratelli d'Italia Europee 2019.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Non-free logo used in a gallery context. Not substantially different from the version in the infobox. Variations in logo not the subject of critical discussion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Giorgia Meloni - Brothers of Italy.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Non-free logo used in a gallery context. Not substantially different from the version in the infobox. Variations in logo not the subject of critical discussion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bioforge.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. Not substantially different from File:Bioforge damage screenshot.gif, which also depicts the character but in a context supported by prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Yeah, redundant, blast it away. -- Phorque (talk) 13:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Icons of Filth artwork.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a - Non-free artwork used in a purely illustrative context. Not the subject of significant critical discussion. If any of these are album cover art - the article is unclear as it's very poorly written - they would be appropriate in articles about the albums but not about the band. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Icons of Filth artwork from the album Onward Christian Soldiers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a - Non-free artwork used in a purely illustrative context. Not the subject of significant critical discussion. If any of these are album cover art - the article is unclear as it's very poorly written - they would be appropriate in articles about the albums but not about the band. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Icons of Filth logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a - Non-free artwork used in a purely illustrative context. Not the subject of significant critical discussion. If any of these are album cover art - the article is unclear as it's very poorly written - they would be appropriate in articles about the albums but not about the band. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Icons of Filth artwork from Onward Christian Soldier album.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a - Non-free artwork used in a purely illustrative context. Not the subject of significant critical discussion. If any of these are album cover art - the article is unclear as it's very poorly written - they would be appropriate in articles about the albums but not about the band. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Candy Brooke - Opulence video.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a - Non-free artwork used in a purely illustrative context. Not the subject of significant critical discussion. If any of these are album cover art - the article is unclear as it's very poorly written - they would be appropriate in articles about the albums but not about the band. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Puss in Boots from Shrek Forever After.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. This image is not critical to the understanding of the article in question and is only described in a single line. There are already several non-free images of the character on the page. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Hello. I just wished to mention the purpose of this particular image. It depicts the character's main appearance throughout an entire film, which differs from his original design (the character appears in his initial design in almost every other feature); the image's main purpose is to portray how the weight gain affected the character's design in that film. The line used in the image's caption highlights what the character's voice actor thought of this new design, but the weight gain itself is mentioned in every section of the article (including the lead). Thank you. Flowerpiep (talk) 23:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete although Flowerpiep makes a good point, the marginal quality the image adds to the article I think is superseded by the fact that there is already another non-free image in the infobox and even if the weight is mentioned "throughout," it's really only mentioned five times in passing so an image isn't essential. Sam-2727 (talk) 02:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.