Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 12

< May 11	May 13 >

May 12[edit]

File:Dundas Square Toronto at night.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as likely copyvio: linked Flickr page is marked CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0 Vahurzpu (talk) 00:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aruban 10 florin banknote front.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are over 20 non-free images on Aruban florin.

Having every front and back of both editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also for deletion in this nomination

File:Aruban 25 florin banknote front.jpg
File:Aruban 50 florin banknote front.jpg
File:Aruban 100 florin banknote front.jpg
File:Aruban 500 florin banknote front.jpg
File:Aruban 10 florin banknote back.jpg
File:Aruban 25 florin banknote back.jpg
File:Aruban 50 florin banknote back.jpg
File:Aruban 100 florin banknote back.jpg
File:Aruban 500 florin banknote back.jpg

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clydesdale-Polymer-£5.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a - There is already another image of the bill in the article in the table File:Clydesdale-Polymer-£5-Front.png. Back of the bill is not critical to the understanding of the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RBS-Polymer-£5.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a - There is already another image of the bill in the article in the table File:RBS-Polymer-£5-Front.png. Back of the bill is not critical to the understanding of the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:10 Cordobas Reg Cir Front.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are 20 non-free images on Nicaraguan córdoba.

Having every front and back of old editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:20 Cordobas Reg Cir Front.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are 20 non-free images on Nicaraguan córdoba.

Having every front and back of old editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:50 Cordobas Front 2002 Reg Cir.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are 20 non-free images on Nicaraguan córdoba.

Having every front and back of old editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:100 Cordobas Front Reg Cir 2002.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are 20 non-free images on Nicaraguan córdoba.

Having every front and back of old editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:500 Cordobas Front da.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are 20 non-free images on Nicaraguan córdoba.

Having every front and back of old editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iran-Iraq Shatt al-Arab Boundries.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Blythwood with the reason "Copyright violation. While this is presented as out of copyright due to publication in 1847, the map explicitly says it comes from a 1985 book and shows the results of a 1975 treaty. While the map shows the political divisions of treaties of 1847 and 1913, there's no evidence that this map itself dates from those time points." FASTILY 07:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. 1985 is the apparent creation date. Would fail WP:NFCC 1 if converted to non-free image. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seal of California, ca. 1870, Desk of the Secretary of the Senate, Senate Chamber, California State Capitol, Sacramento.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See c:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. We have a copyright tag for the object, but we also need one for the photograph. Stefan2 (talk) 12:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep User has relicensed, EXIF is consistent with the user's other uploads from 2012. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arial photo of Grand Canyon University (formerly Grand Canyon College) 1951.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No explanation of why a newly created aerial photo would not serve the same purpose. In order for the FUR to be valid, the appearance of the campus must have been significantly different back in 1951 vs. now, and that difference must be discussed in the article. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The NFUR makes no statement as to why this image isnot replaceable. Fails WP:NFCC#1. The image's claimed purpose is to illustrate "Early Hx of University" but the history section makes no mention of this image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 17:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Rising (MacGyver).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image is claimed to be used for visual identification of an episode of McGyver. However, it is not a title card, logo or other such image that actually identifies the episode. The image also not the subject of significant sourced commentary in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 17:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Truimsgarry Telford Parliamentary church.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Building is in the same condition as it would be right now, so it can be replaced by a newly taken freely licensed photo. We only allow non-free images when free equivalents cannot be created, not when they merely don't exist. Now, a non-free image of the original appearance of the church would clear the bar of replaceability, but it would still fail WP:NFG. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Big gay al and stan marsh in debut episode2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Initially tagged for deletion with {{Di-fails NFCC}} with the following argument: "Criterion 8, because the file does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding". It was contested on the file's talk page by the uploader. Listing for further discussion as a neutral party. Ə XPLICIT 23:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NFCC 8. The depiction of the character isn't a significant component of the article it's in, so it can't be vital to the understanding of the article. If any character were going to get a non-free image, it'd be one from Sailor Moon or Utena, which are discussed at much more length, though even then I think that a freely licensed image of Kunihiko Ikuhara would be the best illustration for the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with @The Squirrel Conspiracy here. I understand their reasoning and as such, I moved it to a more appropriate place, the article, "Big Gay Al's Big Gay Boat Ride". It seems well-suited there as Big Gay Al is literally the central character of the episode. Please see the new reasoning on the file's summary page. Apart from that, @The Squirrel Conspiracy, I DID have a NFCC image from Sailor Moon added to the page before (which is also being challenged for deletion), but it was removed from the page. So, I'm not doing to try again to add it or ANY images from Sailor Moon again, as I think that is a waste of my time. The same would apply to images for Utena, as they would likely also be struck down for whatever reason. I'd rather direct my energies elsewhere. I am not aware of any "freely licensed image of Kunihiko Ikuhara" and doubt one exists, as an artist like him would likely copyright all of his images.--Historyday01 (talk) 02:52, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did some digging and can't find any freely licensed images of Ikuhara on Wikimedia, even in the "Revolutionary Girl Utena" section and I don't even know how I would find it even if I wanted to locate it.--Historyday01 (talk) 03:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Well now it's an entirely different discussion than when the file was originally nominated. It's worth noting that the article Big Gay Al's Big Gay Boat Ride did have an image in the infobox that was deleted as purely decorative in 2014, though CaptainEek tells me that that the deleted image is a still from the boat ride scene itself. (If anything, that would be a more appropriate image for the infobox than this one is). I think the image still fails the NFCC even in the new article, as there's no coverage of the character's depiction in the article, so the image of him can't be critical to readers' understanding. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree completely, as it is an image from the episode which features the character which is the focus of the episode. The whole article is about the character's depiction, as he is the center of the story, so I'm not sure what you mean. Its important to have an image of him in the article itself, which will ONLY be used in the infobox, and nowhere else.Historyday01 (talk) 12:45, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Before I vote, may you please explain why deleting the screenshot would severely affect how readers learn properly about the episode itself? Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 03:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that removing the screenshot would hinder an understanding of the subject. The image is meant to inform readers about an important character in the episode, and serves as a representation of the episode itself.--Historyday01 (talk) 14:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The prominence and exaggerations of the recurring character Big Gay Al in the episode can be already understood without this image. Furthermore, descriptions about his debut appearance can be already conveyed by text, especially without an image of him. If anything, description about the character can be also read at "List of recurring South Park characters#Big Gay Al". Well, WP:NFLIST discourages using individual non-free images but rather encourages one image depicting multiple elements simultaneously, e.g. multiple characters in one image, so an individual image of him would be discouraged.
The screenshot of three characters (whose roles in the episode are already conveyed without a multimedia content) at an outdoor location illustrates the scene itself but doesn't demonstrate why the character's importance (or prominence) would not be well understood without an image of him in the episode. If you don't believe that the article adequately educates readers about the episode without an image, how about using an image of gay animals doing the disco dance shown to one of main characters by Big Gay Al, which is detailed at the "Animation" section? Even then, the disco scene itself lasted just a few seconds or less and is already conveyed by text, so I don't know whether an image of that is needed. George Ho (talk) 22:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I still stand by the inclusion of the image, but I encourage you to add the appropriate image if you find it is necessary.Historyday01 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.