Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 June 20

< June 19	June 21 >

June 20[edit]

File:Living Enrichment Center Krishna statue 1997.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's no freedom of panorama for statues in the United States. — Diannaa (talk) 15:23, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the statue is clearly a significant aspect of the photo and there is no freedom of panorama for statues in the USA. -- Whpq (talk) 17:57, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zimzalabim music video screen capture.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This music video screen shot is being used in the video section in an article about a song. The stated purpose is unspecific on use stating "The photo thumbnail will be placed in the music video section in the article Zimzalabim". The screenshot is not the subject any commentary nor is it in any way illustrative of the elements of the video which are described in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 17:54, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umpah Umpah music video screen capture.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This music video screen shot is being used in the video section in an article about a song. The stated purpose is unspecific on use stating "The photo thumbnail will be placed in the music video section in the article Umpah Umpah". The screenshot is not the subject any commentary nor is it in any way illustrative of the elements of the video which are described in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 17:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Red Flavor music video screen capture.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This music video screen shot is being used in the video section in an article about a song. The stated purpose is unspecific on use stating "The photo thumbnail will be placed in the music video section in the article Red Flavor". The screenshot is not the subject any commentary nor is it in any way illustrative of the elements of the video which are described in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 18:02, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RBB physical.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate cover which is substantially the same as the main cover. Fails WP:NFCC#3a. Whpq (talk) 18:05, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daisie Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid claim of ineligibility in the U.S.; seems clearly to meet the measure of originality Orange Mike | [ [User talk:Orangemike|Talk]] 20:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

I am the uploader of this file, and I am pleased it is being discussed, what ever the result. The reason I uploaded it was for it to be used in the Maisie Williams article (which I helped upgrade to Good Article Status), Game of Thrones actress and internet entrepreneur, to go in the Daisie section here. However as I have little knowledge of whether it would be a breach of copy right or wikipedia rules I have been unsure if the image is allowable. I asked on Wikimedia first and got a bit of advice, but not definite. So I have asked twice on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions ...which you just replied to. :)

Thanks for your reply there. ~ BOD ~ ^TALK 20:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SimpsonsDuckDuckDuckDuck.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality and unencyclopedic. Image is very low quality, containing a watermark that is not related to the show or TV airings. The reason for keeping the file is listed as "the scene has become an internet meme". However, nothing on the article Sleeping with the Enemy (The Simpsons) mentions the meme. The scene in question is not mentioned in the plot section. I'd suggest to delete the picture. Scrooge200 (talk) 22:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no sourced material about this as meme now nor when the image was first added. Fails WP:NFCC#8 -- Whpq (talk) 11:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.