Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 December 25

< December 24	December 26 >

December 25

File:Yurgen Kaneko.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yurgen Kaneko.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slaterfiremap.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slaterfiremap.jpeg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:22, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary and National Park.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary and National Park.JPG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IsoGerizim.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. Deleted by Fastily per WP:G5. (non-admin closure) P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 00:31, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The argument is that the image is public domain because this image of simple geometry is ineligible for copyright. I don't think the argument holds because the image is more than simple geometry. ImTheIP (talk) 08:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:G5 P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:05, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Premier Stephen MacNeil - Headshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent photo. No evidence provided to support public domain claim. Government works in Canada are subject to Crown Copyright (see c:COM:Canada). Wikiacc (¶) 08:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RV Used In Nashville Bombing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Acroterion (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a legitimate PD-reason. Also, the Metro Nashville Police Department didn't create it, they published it as part of a current investigation. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 22:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RV Used In Nashville Bombing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Acroterion (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whether a file is in the public domain is not determined by whether they have commercial interest in the photo but whether the file is ineligible for copyright. There is no evidence to show that the Nashville PD made this file available under the public domain. CCTV footage may potentially be made available under the public domain (but I am not sure) as it records indiscriminately and thus records stuff that is common property or lacks original authorship. But the current tag and rationale does not seem to be a valid reason for a file to be made available under the public domain. {{Non-free video screenshot}} may better be applied to this photo. Aasim (talk) 22:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BTS - Dynamite.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The image is similar to the official single cover (File:BTS - Dynamite (official cover).png, already located as the main infobox image). This image does not satisfy WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 and can easily be replaced with text. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Metal 2 Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 February 8. FASTILY 00:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metal 2 Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Be Happy (Mary J. Blige song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete File:Be Happy by Mary J Blige US commercial cassette.jpg. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both images are (almost) the same, so we shall decide whether to keep either the (non-US) square-ish variant or the US cassette one. I more prefer the US cassette variant because the song charted on Billboard and was targeted toward US customers primarily. At that time, presumably, single CDs weren't prevalent in the US at that time. On the other hand, the single also charted in Australia and the UK. I predict that the square-ish variant would be favored more because of consistency with most other singles, but I welcome input. George Ho (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep only one - The use of these two cover which use essentially the same image fails WP:NFCC#3a. I have no opinion on which is preferable so I will default to the nominator's recommendation. -- Whpq (talk) 19:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm OK with the cassette image. Just thought the quality of the CD version is better -- Nobooy (talk)
- Delete File:Be Happy by Mary J Blige US commercial cassette.jpg and keep File:Be Happy (Mary J. Blige song).jpg because the former looks faded and the latter looks much less so although a little faded. — WinnerWolf99 ^talk_{What did I break now?} 21:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, FASTILY 01:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one or the other. One cover, not two, is permitted for visual identification. I have no strong preference which one is kept. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:54, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is agreement that only one should be kept. Which one is preferred?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:50, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete File:Be Happy by Mary J Blige US commercial cassette.jpg per WinnerWolf. Though this version was uploaded first, it does not seem to depict the cover in the quality that the other does. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:23, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.