Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 August 18

< August 17	August 19 >

August 18[edit]

File:Uniacke Square Lane between 1966 and 1971.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided that this photo is in the public domain in the US. Wikiacc (¶) 00:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The stated PD reasoning is "Rules for Archival Description", but Rules for Archival Description is a descriptive standard for archival and does not specify that an archived work is public domain. -- Whpq (talk) 13:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Primo de Rivera Estella.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plausibly unfree, see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miguel rivera.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fite TV Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted by File:FITE TV.svg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 06:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Northwest Territories Licence Plate 1981 bear design.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Northwest Territories Licence Plate 1981 bear design.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Micronesia Chuuk license plate graphic.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Micronesia Chuuk license plate graphic.png. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ashok-Arora.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have some concerns about the "Own Work" status of this file. There are no EXIF details, something unusual on a contemporary picture. It leads to suspicions that the file is scanned or grabbed from elsewhere.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. Potential copyright violation Fiddle Faddle 09:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Absent other evidence, simply lacking EXIF is not a reason to delete. -- Whpq (talk) 13:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.