Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 May 9

< May 8	May 10 >

May 9[edit]

File:Facebook user page (2019).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: crop and reduce. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

too large, whitespace should be cropped as is unnecessary to illustrate the subject and resolution lowered per WP:NFCC Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Leucolej cells.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

missing verifiable source and therefore evidence of permission FASTILY 08:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The original has disappeared from pt.WP and there is no copy on Commons. I presume some issue was discovered and the original copy deleted. Without verifiable source information, this should probably be deleted as per the nomination. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:53, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Desflurane.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image of the chemical structure of Desflurane was useful when it was uploaded in 2004. It is currently orphaned and has been replaced with File:(RS)-Desfluran Structural Formula V1.svg on commons. I do not believe that it will be used in the future. I am happy to move it to Commons if others feel that would be more appropriate, but my recommendation is to delete it with thanks the the contributor. ★ Bigr Tex 15:33, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 05:53, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pizza hut.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Resolution, Likely Copyright violation. It appears that Pale blue dot uploaded and licensed an original picture of a Pizza Hut at the Lahore Railway Station in 2004. In 2007, User:Bhsgrad07 uploaded an image of a Pizza Hut from the Hartwall Arena website on top of Pale Blue Dot's. At some point we lost the original image. The image which was at http://www.hartwall-areena.com/en/kuvat/pizza_hut.jpg is the same as the one being nominated. ★ Bigr Tex 18:21, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:53, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mcdonald's at platform.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality (blurry), orphaned image of a McDonald's window in a busy train station. I believe that it is unlikely to be used on any of the Wikimedia projects in the future, but would be willing to move to Commons if others disagree. ★ Bigr Tex 19:10, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:54, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sprite coca cola shop.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry image of a beverage stand in a railway station in Pakistan. It is not currently used anywhere and I doubt it will be found to be useful in the future. As usual, I am willing to move to Commons if others disagree and believe that it would be useful. ★ Bigr Tex 19:16, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:54, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coca cola shop.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Out of focus image of a beverage stand in a railway station in Pakistan. It is not currently used anywhere and I doubt it will be found to be useful in the future. As usual, I am willing to move to Commons if others disagree and believe that it would be useful ★ Bigr Tex 19:21, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:54, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blenheim East Gate.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality scan of a photograph owned by the uploader. Image is of the East gate of Blenheim Palace, which is currently illustrated with this better image from Commons. The claim that the uploader could release the rights because they own the photograph is sketchy and they have not participated in more than a decade. I appreciate the contribution, but don't feel comfortable moving to Commons and doubt that it will be used in the future. ★ Bigr Tex 21:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:55, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Salavat. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chum box example cnn.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely replaceable, and I don't think a CNN screenshot specifically is justified. wumbolo ^^^ 21:36, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.