Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 March 19

< March 18	March 20 >

March 19[edit]

File:Navy Seal copypasta.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 11:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-text}} does not apply to this image because it isn't an image of an individual word or slogan, but is an image of an entire paragraph. Despite the fact that this paragraph has been widely used across the internet, it still has an original author that holds a copyright on the text. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 02:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. It's literally just text. How is this copywritable. Also, see the first part of the sentence: This image only consists of typefaces. Nixinova T C 04:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your argument is invalid. Copyright was originally invented to protect text. -FASTILY 06:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fastily is right. Delete since meme would be copyrighted and there's no evidence that author (whomever they are) has released text from copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 15:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ¶ This is a derivative work of somebody else's copyrighted production. Nixinova (talk · contribs) may have created the image, but they extensively used somebody else's copyright to do so. Similarly, if Nixinova painted an award-winning masterpiece, and I took a close-up Polaroid instant photo of it, the photograph is derivative of the original work; if I release my photograph into the public domain, it's still burdened by Nixinova's original copyright. — fourthords | =Λ= | 16:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even though this image is purely text, PD-text does not apply because this is a whole paragraph that is long enough to be eligible for copyright. I don’t know who the original creator is, as with popular memes that get circulated a lot on the internet. Therefore, I have no idea what the original creator licensed it as. —-Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shavian user.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:35, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned and low res with no encyclopedic value. --𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 19:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seeme2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:35, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned image of an unknown person (at least I have no clue who it is), and no value --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 03:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:England-red.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned and no obvious value (you can find that shade of red from the actual images of the England flag, such as this). --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 03:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rformula.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Euthydemus.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Image was previously on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthydemus_I . It is a better protrait that the coin there now, which I doubt is even contemporary with Euthydemus. Yet I have no strong interested in re-attaching it to the Euthydemus article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esnible (talk • contribs) 00:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hannah fitch shaw.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pohorence.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
dElete orphaned and no obvious value, and image of unknown person --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ddd-pic006.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hydrogen orbital 3p.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CT-AUX-bitmap02.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yusurname.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Greek-Cross-small-.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, superior version available: File:Greek cross.svg FASTILY 06:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 23:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sauder.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Monoidal nat transfo mult.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Turkeyfoot Country Market Iredell Cnty NC US.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xnoriec.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Griefknot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, replaced by a better version. PAR (talk) 19:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gravitational Beam Emitter - Level 4.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.