Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 July 1

< June 30	July 2 >

July 1[edit]

File:BritishMuseumHypocephalusEA8445.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 August 20. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:BritishMuseumHypocephalusEA8445.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:BritishMuseumHypocephalusofHesikhebEA37908.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:BritishMuseumHypocephalusofNeshorpakheredEA36188.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:BritishMuseumHypocephalusEA37907.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LouvreHypocephalusofIrethorrou.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. As noted here, PD-Art only applies to 2D objects which this one is not. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per the referenced page, looks like this image does not have a free license release, and can only, in effect, be used via fair use. Steel1943 (talk) 02:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter states "Mere mechanical scans or photocopies, made by somebody else, of an object or design old enough to be in the public domain (usually 70 years after the death of the author)". All of these images are thousands of years olds, and definitely fall into the category of mechanical scans or photocopies. Do you agree that I just need to replace the license information or do you think I am doing something illegal? Epachamo (talk) 02:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not thinking you are doing anything "illegal", but there is another possible issue here, even if these are too old for copyright. These pictures may still have their copyrights held by who took them (if they are considered unique/artistic enough), and the images may still have their copyrights held by whoever took them. At this point, I'm not sure. Steel1943 (talk) 02:51, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm no artist, but I do not see anything unique/artistic in the photographs. I'm also no lawyer, so I will concur with someone that knows better. (I will add that plundering Egypts cultural heritage, and then acting like they can copyright it is mindblowing to me.) Epachamo (talk) 16:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - I concur. Copyright laws are a bit strange in that way, especially if the photographer claims the photograph is artistically unique with the angle they took it, or shadowing, or something like that. Steel1943 (talk) 17:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use is not an option for this image in the article where it is used. The article is about a type of objects. The article is not about the photographic work of photographer C. Décamps. The pictured object is not copyrighted and fair use is irrelevant for it. As for the photographic work of the photographer, either it is copyrighted or it's not copyrighted. If it's not copyrighted, there is no problem. If the photographic work is copyrighted, fair use is not an option unless the photo is used in the context of a substantial commentary about the photographic work of C. Décamps. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:57, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly to the other discussion, the main question is whether it is applicable to use {{PD-Art}}. Which is not unlikely. -- HarJIT (talk) 16:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator comment. Just realized something that may deter the {{PD-Art}} possibility for this nomination only: This image has a copyright stamp in the bottom left corner. Steel1943 (talk) 17:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete à la c:COM:When to use the PD-Art tag#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. The photograph is of an ancient engraving on a bronze disk. That the image on the disk is engraved rather than painted is what makes all the difference when it comes to whether the photograph is a slavish reproduction or not. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If I made a facsimile of the bronze object based on the photograph, would that be illegal? Epachamo (talk) 13:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xi'an10.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious free license claim on watermarked image. Same user had a ton of images deleted in 2008 for similar issues. Not sure there's a speedy tag that applies but plz ping and advise if there is and I'll tag the rest as that. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Llangollen Church and Riverside Walk.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete the medal image. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:36, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the "09:08, 25 October 2007" image only. The medal might be copyrighted. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 04:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: agree with nominater. -- CptViraj (📧) 11:32, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CWSRF V.GIF[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

missing verifiable source FASTILY 09:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to PNG file. Salavat (talk) 13:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CWSRF Logo (1).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

missing verifiable source FASTILY 09:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Car on Aluminum Platter Turntable.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 09:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 13:50, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nominater. -- CptViraj (📧) 11:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Combat Parachutist Badge 5.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

missing verifiable source FASTILY 09:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No Source! -- CptViraj (📧) 11:21, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charles E. Sawyer (1920).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

missing verifiable source FASTILY 09:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added the source photo for this picture: Library of Congress Cmguy777 (talk) 02:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CAA Arena - Belleville, Ontario.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per C:COM:TOO#Canada, I'm thinking this logo is not unique enough for copyright in Canada, and thus should be moved to Commons. Steel1943 (talk) 19:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:"WE" Author's Autograph Page.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 August 20. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:"WE" Author's Autograph Page.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:String Figures and How to Make Them.djvu[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Something is amiss with this image; the image doesn't match the description. If you click on the third image in the gallery of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rai_stones, you will see this image of Rais. If you then click View on Commons you will see the correct image for this description. Grika Ⓣ 22:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.