Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 December 31

< December 30	January 1 >

December 31[edit]

File:NavalReserveBadge.bmp[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a .bmp image for which a .jpg now exists and is in use, that being File:USNR Qualification Pin.jpg. This image is no longer in use, and it has been tagged as a duplicate with a request for speedy deletion, but does not meet criteria WP:CSD#F1 User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to JPG file. Salavat (talk) 03:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doctor Who Series 11 Episode 7 Kerblam!.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The non-free content policy trumps the MOS. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does not provide educational value and is only used for decoration in an infobox without critical commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per MOS:TVIMAGE: if a promotional poster or image exists then it may be used. Other options include [...] a screenshot of a significant moment or element from the episode. The image conforms with this as a promotional image of the episode. -- /Alex/₂₁ 07:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Alex 21, Per Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images #4: promotional images may be used for critical commentary which this lacks. What is the commentary provided by this image? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:03, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lam Siu-Por not clapping.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 January 18. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lam Siu-Por not clapping.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The current Scuderia Ferrari logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated logo, not specifically discussed in the article and not essential to understanding the topic (other logos are more controversial and detailed within the article body, but not this one). Ytoyoda (talk) 14:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.