Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 August 14

< August 13	August 15 >

August 14

File:BubbleGuppiesFanBoiRoblox.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file used only in userspace. TheAwesome Hwyh 01:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly fails WP:NFCC#9. -- Whpq (talk) 21:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The River Niger Original Film Poster Thumbnail.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 1 and 8. Film's poster is being used on biography of film's director. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it is claimed to be used for primary identification but it is not used that way as it is in a section of the bio and it cannot be used that way as it doe snot identify the subject who iaa person and not a film. -- Whpq (talk) 21:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Creston Valley Advance Editorial, August 14, 2000.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need for a non-free image of the editorial. The allegations of sexual misconduct are in the article as text and are sufficient for the reader to understand. Fails WP:NFCC#1. Whpq (talk) 19:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, this definitely fails. Newspaper articles are cited in Wikipedia. We do not display images of those articles. -- WikiPedant (talk) 19:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonfree images of text should generally be replaced by free summary text. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 23:21, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shibuya Moyai.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree. Photographer and uploader tagged with GNU/CC licenses but Commons states Japan does not allow freedom of panorama for commercial use. Can't determine original creator. I added it to Moai before removing it and is otherwise orphaned aside from Talk:Moai. 9³ (talk) 20:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.